To: Oldeconomybuyer
If you ever listened to Levin, you’d know that the real power doesn’t come from the Ruling Class per se, it’s from the hundreds of bureaucrats that write law and supersede Congress’ authority out from under their ass.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
“In addition, paperwork associated with the vending machine rule will take 1,507,788.5 hours to complete.”
“Hey Frank - how the heck do we know how much it will cost? But they want a number.”
“Yeah - whatever. But put a .5 at the end so they’ll think it is real.”
3 posted on
12/04/2014 4:23:28 PM PST by
21twelve
(http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2185147/posts 2013 is 1933 REBORN)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
I'm really convinced it's all the implementation of Cloward\Pivens.
6 posted on
12/04/2014 4:43:32 PM PST by
SWAMPSNIPER
(The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
As a poster here on FR explained to me once. “A label cost less than a penny, I buy them at the office supply.”
7 posted on
12/04/2014 4:50:13 PM PST by
PeterPrinciple
(Thinking Caps are no longer being issued but there must be a warehouse full of them somewhere.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
That’s OK. President Cruz can sign an executive order cancelling this nonsense out.
10 posted on
12/04/2014 5:31:30 PM PST by
Fast Moving Angel
(It is no more than a dream remembered, a Civilization gone with the wind.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
What good is a label when more than Half of the Public School Graduates Cannot Read??
11 posted on
12/04/2014 5:40:31 PM PST by
eyeamok
To: Oldeconomybuyer
12 posted on
12/04/2014 5:44:01 PM PST by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
It won’t cost the “restaurant industry” (our neighbors who own these businesses) $1.7B. It will cost their customers (our neighbors who eat out) an estimated $1.7B.
And the benefit? Zero. Anyone who doesn’t already know that a bacon cheeseburger or the McD’s fries are high in fat doesn’t care.
13 posted on
12/04/2014 5:55:56 PM PST by
Pollster1
("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
CA has had this posting regulation for years.
Nobody evens reads the Calorie Numbers on the Menu.
All this time I have NEVER heard anyone even mention the Calorie Count on the Menu, unless they were asking what those silly numbers next to the Food Item were.
Mon Productive Busy Work strikes again, with a Billion Dollar Price Tag.
16 posted on
12/04/2014 9:11:52 PM PST by
Kickass Conservative
(If you thought the Mulatto Marxist was bad, wait until the Menopausal Marxist is Elected.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer; SheLion; Eric Blair 2084; -YYZ-; 31R1O; 383rr; AFreeBird; AGreatPer; Alamo-Girl; ..
Costs are likely to be passed onto consumers, but the FDA believes Americans will be happy to pay more for additional nutrition information.
Speak for yourselves, losers!
Nanny State PING!
To: Oldeconomybuyer
” but the FDA believes Americans will be happy to pay more for additional nutrition information.”
Yea, we are thrilled......
19 posted on
12/05/2014 9:46:06 PM PST by
mowowie
(`)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Because warning labels on cigarettes work so well they may as well apply it to EVERYTHING.
21 posted on
12/06/2014 8:32:32 AM PST by
unixfox
(Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
