Posted on 12/04/2014 11:09:54 AM PST by WhiskeyX
One of Bill Cosby's alleged sexual assault victims recently got out of prison for, among other things, fraud ... and Cosby is now lashing out at her.
(Excerpt) Read more at tmz.com ...
I wonder if she knew the “gentle giant’s” stepdad when she was in prison. Lots of people listen to and believe him.
For some reason reminds me of the LA guy who claimed that his Toyota’s accelerator pedal got stuck and caused a serious accident.
Turned out he was a grafter.
And why are we not surprised? All of a sudden all these women start coming forward with accusations? Then venues start cancelling Cosby with no evidence or facts? Guilty first - like Napoleonic law in France. You’re guilty and have to prove your innocence?
OK, how about the other 21 accusers?
One is morals and one is law. It is in court that one is innocent until proved guilty. It is out in the cruel cruel world where trivial people make accusations, gossip and publish innuendo along with true charges. Charges in court and charges through the media are two different “arenas.” It is our current culture that LOVES gossip and Hollywood trash.
I’m just wondering if Cosby was running for some office as a Republican ... or these women are looking at some gold mine.
Because Bill Cosby has the protection of the statute of limitations and the alleged victims have the 1st Amendment right of free speech, it is Bill Cosby’s obligation to defend his reputation by suing for defamation in the cases where he is innocent, use his 5th Amendment to remain silent and avoid self incrimination if he is guilty of the rapes, or come forward and confess his guilt and atone for his crimes if he is guilty. The choice is Bill Cosby’s at this point in time.
I'm not saying he didn't do some of the things he's accused of, but I also believe he has a target on his back. My question is WHO is orchestrating behind the scenes... all the accusers coming forward after decades of time passed?
Cosby despises republicans, and is a devoted democrat who was a strong personal supporter of the Tawana Brawley rape hoax.
Wow, he might be a serial rapist who drugs his victims, but........
Probably money plus fifteen minutes of fame. The lawyer gets publicity which brings in business that one rarely hears about. Interestingly the lawyer for the accusers asked Cosby to waive the Statute of Limitations which implies she knows such law bars many of her clients claims.
oh oh... looks like Hillary is coming after the Cosby accusers!
“OK, how about the other 21 accusers?”
$100.000.000 payday, that is what the other 21 (and many more to come) are all about.
Back in 1975 I was bartending in Los Angeles, and some of the cocktail waitresses I worked with were invited to be Playboy Bunnies at Hugh Hefner’s mansion. Somehow the topic of Bill Cosby came up on a few occasions,, and these women made it forcefully clear they did not want to have anything to do with Bill Cosby at the mansion. They never said exactly why they disliked the idea of encountering Bill Cosby while they worked at the mansion, but their attitude was memorable enough to recall every time Bill Cosby’s name was mentioned again for all these years to come. I was left with the distinct impression there was something wrong with respect to Bill Cosby when several of these women expressed the same concerns and loathing.
Karma?
Right - just wondering though why now? And in Sandusky vs statute of limitations ... what was the oldest on that case?
But then if Cosby is past that SOL then what do those women gain? The whole thing is weird.
Cosby is now lashing out at her.
+++++
Not a good idea in bringing up lashings to his problems.
All 20 of them? At this volume it’s a given that at least one is a slip and fall artist, that’s just how dog piles work. But not all of them, probably not even most.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.