Replies

Most Downs kids have a stronger sense of morality than a lot of geniuses that believe their intellect justifies them breaking a few rules in order to advance a greater good.

Thanks for pointing out the obvious.

When one understands that God wants certain things, it is not hard to trace out good reasons why for most of them.

Most Downs kids have a stronger sense of morality than a lot of geniuses that believe their intellect justifies them breaking a few rules in order to advance a greater good.

Actually, it's a good number of those self-exalted "geniuses" even on this board who mistakenly try to extrapolate the simple matter of one's skin color to an inherent inclination to commit crime.

Through their own practice of the tyranny of lowered expectations they themselves are responsible for perpetuating broad misconceptions peddled largely by today's liberal class:

"Blacks can't do this, or that, because they are not capable, or able, or skilled ... "

"Blacks can't seem to learn. Let the elites order their ways for them."

"Blacks have low IQ's = blacks have a propensity for criminal activity."

"Black can't do anything productive without some (usually) white self-important liberal standing by his side telling him what to do, as that same liberal parcels out his allowance."

"Blacks commit crime because they are 'less evolved' than those whose skin color has less melanin."

Statements such as these typically come from flawed Darwinian assumptions based as they are on writings of Wallace and Darwin (Darwin particularly in his "Decent of Man") and parroted in fashionable academia by contemporary evolutionists like Huxley, Haeckel, and others of their clearly bigotted acolytes and eugenists.

Absolutely simplistic, and a deceptive misrepresentation on so many levels, yet strangely some calling themselves conservatives around here buy into the liberal academic pap as perpetuated by a liberal media culture as well as the psychobabble of those calling themselves "Intellectuals."

Coddling ANY defined subgroup of human beings in a way that causes them to become dependent on another for their subsistence merely exchanges one form of overt slavery for another regardless of one's skin color.

Consider the writings of Booker T. Washington, who wrote not only the famous, Up from Slavery, but also wrote in My Larger Education, Being Chapters from My Experience(1911), in chapter 5 "The Intellectuals and the Boston Mob":

"There is a class of colored people who make a business of keeping the troubles, the wrongs, and the hardships of the Negro race before the public. Some of these people do not want the Negro to lose his grievances, because they do not want to lose their jobs. I am afraid that there is a certain class of race-problem solvers who don't want the patient to get well, because as long as the disease holds out they have not only an easy means of making a living, but also an easy medium through which to make themselves prominent before the public...."

"My experience is that people who call themselves "The Intellectuals" understand theories, but they do not understand things. I have long been convinced that, if these men could have gone into the South and taken up and become interested in some practical work which would have brought them in touch with people and things, the whole world would have looked very different to them. Bad as conditions might have seemed at first, when they saw that actual progress was being made, they would have taken a more hopeful view of the situation."
The tyranny of lowered expectations as expressed by those calling themselves "conservatives" is no less disdainful and simplistic than the same position as promulgated by Darwinistic liberals.

And I will challenge those who espouse Darwinistic liberal philosophy every chance I get.

FReegards!