Posted on 12/02/2014 12:18:46 PM PST by C19fan
Congressional Republicans are locked in an internal debate over a difficult dilemma: Is there any way of persuading conservatives they are fighting against Obamas immigration tyranny with everything theyve got, without fully using the destructive scorched earth tactics conservatives actually want them to employ against it?
This internal tactical struggle and with it, the broader debate over immigration are now set to spill over into the GOP presidential primary. Jeb Bush has now come out against the tactics conservatives want which are favored by Ted Cruz.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
Why won't Obama ever just compromise and stop being to obstructive?
The tab for king obamas amnesty decree? It could be $6 TRILLION
By: DrJohn
http://floppingaces.net/2014/11/23/the-tab-for-king-obamas-amnesty-decree-it-could-be-6-trillion/
The typical unlawful immigrant is 34 years old. After amnesty, this individual will receive government benefits, on average, for 50 years. Restricting access to benefits for the first 13 years after amnesty therefore has only a marginal impact on long-term costs.
If amnesty is enacted, the average adult unlawful immigrant would receive $592,000 more in government benefits over the course of his remaining lifetime than he would pay in taxes.
Over a lifetime, the former unlawful immigrants together would receive $9.4 trillion in government benefits and services and pay $3.1 trillion in taxes. They would generate a lifetime fiscal deficit (total benefits minus total taxes) of $6.3 trillion. (All figures are in constant 2010 dollars.) This should be considered a minimum estimate. It probably understates real future costs because it undercounts the number of unlawful immigrants and dependents who will actually receive amnesty and underestimates significantly the future growth in welfare and medical benefits.
The most recent studies after the fact, concluded that Obamas unlawful Amnesty will cost over $6 trillion just regarding Social Security and Medicare bankrupting both.
And you know why conservatives are not behind ‘sensible’ immigration bills? Cause they all want amnesty and no one trusts them.....period.
Traitor, Sell-Out and Satan... I mean JEB!, Rupert Murdoch and Valerie Jarrett at the WSJ CEO Council dinner dining on human flesh.
The GOPe know Chris Christie does not sell outside of New Jersey. He does not pass the stink test.
So now they are rolling out Bush #3 and Romney to make sure the Democrats will win the White House either way.
Make no mistake Bush and Romney are DEMOCRATS with Rs by their name. If elected, then they will continue to drive this country into Socialism.
Well then we better make damn sure when the party convenes in Cleveland for the national convention in the summer of 2016 it will be for the nomination for Ted Cruz or Scott Walker.
"Son, before you say its an act of love, please keep in mind I have six holstered pistols. That's the only love red-blooded American rednecks show to varmints out there. Yuppers, THAT means YOU!"
“Move to Mexico Bush, you unbelievable P O S !”
And take your “Mexican Wife” with you.
Him being married to a Mexican that smuggles won´t give him much credit in my opinion.
John Ellis Bush, or JEB: go get your medal shine box and give another Democrat a medal Jebbie!
I don’t want him,
you can have him,
he’s too fat for me.
(But he’s really playing hard to forget.)
The Conventions use to be it.
However, today they are simply a dog and pony show.
The real battle will happen in the first 10 states. At that point we will know who will get it.
Rest assured if Bush or Romney get it, then they will NOT get my vote.
I don’t care WHO they are running against. This is because both Bush and Romney are Socialist. So it would not be that different from the DNC candidate.
Hey Jeb just go back to your senorita and leave the rest of us alone.
No more Bushes, no more Clintons.
Go away Jeb
Bush’s = Blue blood carpetbaggers.
Spanish-Language Campaign Ad Calls Tea Party "Radical Terrorists"
Breitbart ^ | Nov. 2, 2014 | Sarah Rumpf / FR Posted by River Hawk
AUSTIN, Texas -- The Bexar County Democratic Party launched a controversial Spanish-language ad during the final week before the November 4 elections, calling tea party Republicans "radical terrorists."
The Democrat campaign ad begins showing the American and Mexican flags, with a male narrator saying in Spanish that the flags represent "friendship, liberty, opportunity, and justice," then showing a Gadsden flag with its famous "Don't Tread on Me" motto. The Gadsden flag, which the ad calls "muy peligrosa," or "very dangerous," was designed in 1775 during the American Revolution and has since been adopted as a symbol by various libertarian and tea party groups.
The Democrat campaign ad then proceeds to call tea party Republicans "radical terrorists" while showing images of militia members holding guns and wearing camouflage, threatening "our children and families with violence and firearms," urging viewers to "¡Voto Demócrata!"
The full text of the ad, in English: "These two flags represent friendship, liberty, opportunity and justice. This flag is very dangerous. It is the flag of the Republicans of the Tea Party. They are radical terrorists who want to take matters into their own hands, affecting our children and families with violence and firearms on the border and in our cities.
This Tuesday, November 4th, is the day of the election and its the only time we can make our voice count. For our common good, Vote Democrat!"
Bexar County Democratic Party Chairman Manuel Medina admitted his organization was responsible for the ad, and claimed credit himself for creating it.
Medina went even further in an interview with the San Antonio Express-News, saying, "The tea party is not a political party. They're a terrorist organization."
The Express-News also reported that the ad was running on Univision, paid for by a $25,000 donation from personal injury attorney Thonas J. Henry. (Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Jebbie is just doing what GHWB and GWB wanted to do but were too cautious.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.