Despite The Faux Outrage, The Media Really Loves Ferguson

Black & Right ^ | 12/2/14 | Bob Parks

[impetrio1]

Let’s not forget; to the media, Ferguson was NEVER about law enforcement, death, the black community, justice, injustice, inner city poverty, or whatever other code word that exemplifies what happened in that small Missouri town. To the media, it was all about ratings because they’ve had all their pieces in place for years.

The decision to cover the Michael Brown shooting was not a result of its importance. It was a calculated decision by those in the media’s upper echelon to shed their white guilt and bring “attention” to what they consider long-simmering, racial injustice. When the shooting occurred, the media collectively had none of the details we have now. It was just a juicy “white cop kills black kid” scenario just waiting for an Law & Order: Special Victims Unit treatment.

[SMARTY]

“The Media Really Loves Ferguson”

THAT’S a given!!

It’s right up there on their ‘Katrina’ meter

[Junk Silver]

If CNN could just get a bunch of Ferguson rioters to board a Malaysian Airlines flight that then vanished life would be perfect.

[Jeff Head]

These liberal progressives in the media are willfully wresting the truth.

They ignore the facts and then blatantly pervert the truth into their false narratives in order to advance their ideological goals.

What HAppened in Ferguson, MO...and Why

I do not care what color a person is, what their religion is, what their culture is, etc. when these set of facts come together, the outcome is not only predicatable, it is just:

• A big, strong, (6'4" almost 300 pound) 18 year old man robs a convienence store. (Robbery)
• When confronted by the clerk, on his way out with the stolen material, the big, strong 18 year-old man grabs the clerk by the throat and shoves him away. (Strong-arm Robbery)
• After robbing the store, the bigh strong 18 year old man walks with his accomplisce right down the middle of the public street. (Jaywalking)
• When a Police office sees the two men walking in the middle of the street, he drives up to them and asks them to get out of the middle of the street.
• The big strong 18 year old man profanes the police officer and refuses to stop walking in the middile of the street. (Failure to follow instructions of a Law Enforcement Officer)
• The police officer watches them continue, and then hears about the robbery and sees that the two individuals match the description of the robbers.
• The Police officer now approaches the two with his car, pulls up next to them and indicates he needs to talk to them and tries to open his door.
• The big strong 18 year old uses his body mass to block the door and not let the officer out (Obstruction).
• The Police Officer and the big strong 18 yer old exchange words and a struggle insues with the officer inside his car and the big strong 18 year old outside, leaning in through the window. (Assault)
• The big strong 18 year old attempts to wrestle the officer's gun away from him, striking the officer in the face as he does so (Battery)
• The officer, in trying to maintain control of the weapopn, ultimately pulls the trigger, discharging the gun once inside the car.
• The big strong 18 year old is struck in the hand and then turns and leaves.
• The police officer, exits the car and follows the two robbers, telling them to stop and drawing his weapon.
• The big sytrong 18 year old turns and again profanse the police officer, refusing to follow his instructions, and then, bum charges the police officer. (Assault)
• The police officer, who had alread witnessed the strength and ill intent of the big strong 18 year old, decides his assailant will do him gross bodily harm if he reaches the officer, so he opens fire on his attacker.
• The big srong 18 year old is struck several times, the last shot within 10-12 feet of the officer, striking him the head and killing him.

This is what ocvcurred that day. it is cooberated by seven eye witnesses and the Police Officer's report. MOst of the woitnesses are African-American themselves.

The big strong Micael Borwn committred multiple crimes and was willing to assault and injure the officer in order to not get caught and apprehended. In the end, he was going to attack and seriously injure or kill that officer.

Michael Brwon was acriminal thug who reaped the direct consequences of his own actions. Plain and simple, and it does not matter what color he was.

The officeer acted approriately...even herocilally IMHO...and the grand jury, once they saw the evidence, amde the onluy rational and just decision they could...NO BILL...no charges.

Activists, Race baiters, progressive liberals want to turn this into a race issue...but it was not and is n9ot. Those people inciting these riots, IMHO< including the US Attorney General and thee Rpersident, should themselves be charged with the looting, arson, assault, and murders that have occurred as a result of that inciting.

[867V309]

[tacticalogic]

These liberal progressives in the media are willfully wresting the truth.

That's why it's "politically correct".

Because in any other context it's just flat wrong.

[Rockpile]

This Parks guy is on target with this accurate essay. I paraphrase:

When the presstitutes don’t report something then it is important.

And
Until the news-fakers have to endure pain from the slop they serve up there will be more of this.

[Tilted Irish Kilt]

Jeff Head:" Michael Brwon was acriminal thug who reaped the direct consequences of his own actions. Plain and simple, and it does not matter what color he was."

EXACTLY TRUE !
He suffered the consequences of his CHARACTER ,..not the color of his skin.( Sorry for the abomination of Dr. Martin Luther King speech, paraphrased)
If Michael Brown had been white , 6' 4" at almost 300 pounds, and committed the same actions ,I would have expected the same outcome,
but the President wouldn't have politicised it, the "JUST-US" Dept. wouldn't have investigated, and the media would have totally ignored it.
And that is the truth ,.. and everyone knows it, including the Justice Dept., and the media !

[ryan71]

Clearly Eric Holder and Obama don't see it that way at all.

Holder is calling for retraining of police to not racially profile. Was Brown racially profiled? Not in any stretch of the logical imagination.

Obama, knowing very well the facts did not tell protesters to go home. Instead, he called for peaceful protest. What better way to say you think the grand jury decision was wrong? Now, he calls for police to wear cameras, inferring that police need to be kept in line. This is just more, “the police acted stupidly”.

[norton]

"a calculated decision by those in the media’s upper echelon to shed their white guilt and bring “attention” to what they consider long-simmering, racial injustice...

Which is mirrored by the innate liberal drive to "shed white guilt" by making sure the riots get under way and keep going once started;
Regardless what is said or written, scenes of these riots are full of white faces (and now Guy Faulks masks favored by a mostly white anarchist movement). If LA's Rodney King rioting is any guide I'd bet the opening "attention getting" in Furgeson was staged by a small cell of white liberals knowing full well what the result would be.

[Neoliberalnot]

Here is a bit of a different take on Ferguson:
Now Fred Reed has really gone and done it! Dang the truth - it just won’t go away!: http://www.fredoneverything.net/Ferguson2.shtml

[Species8472]

Ferguson is a giant false flag to cover the fact that Obama threw every unemployed black person in the country under the bus last week with his “executive amnesty”