Just Ask Sodom
Posted on 11/28/2014 12:59:23 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
So in other words the President could give blood
Nope.
They have wanted to give HIV or AIDS and whatever else to straight people forever, Obama might just let them
Why don’t they set up a homosexual blood bank, for homosexual donors and homosexual recipients only?
Set it up in The Castro and other corresponding homosexual communities. Then distribute the blood to homosexuals who are in need of blood donations. Problem solved.
Or do we have to get into the whole business of how homosexuals feeling are hurt, self-esteem disturbed and all that, by the blood ban being in place?
Homosexual Agenda vs. Nanny State PING!
Odd, and queer, and quite peculiar.
Someone thinks HIV should be more widespread.
How do you stop being a fag for a year?
Translation: Store up your own blood if you know a surgery or procedure is coming and try to get relatives and friends to donate in an emergency.
We’re trusting them now to say they have never had such sex. There is too little stated here to analyze the question.
As I have posted multiple times in threads on this subject, including two weeks ago, these sorry bass-turds are directly responsible for the deaths of innocent people in the 80s. One of these innocents was a childhood friend with hemophilia who had to use clotting factors derived from donated blood. He was robbed of life by these perverse butt-humpers. I have nothing but disgust for them. They deserve nothing and we deserve to have a clean blood supply.
I’m permanently banned from donation due to serving in the US military in West Germany with potential exposure to CJV. The poofter crowd deserves nothing less.
Critics of the ban, which was enacted during the national AIDS epidemic in 1983 and was last updated in 1992, say it ignores mounds of scientific evidence concluding that blood donations pose no risk than the greater public if properly screened.Arthur Ashe was unavailable for comment.
This is patently unfair to former Ebola patients, both men and woman.
This is utterly insane. I’ve posted here before, but in a nutshell: Gay and Bi men under the age of 25 account for almost 70% of new HIV infections and a similar amount of new syphilis infections.
Testing of donated blood is reliable, but it is not foolproof. It is sheer madness to allow a high-risk group like that into the blood supply. The proposed “no sex for a year” protocols are stupid. Are we seriously supposed to believe someone is going to stop having sex for a year to donate a pint of blood?
Stupid, stupid, stupid idea in the works here.
The reason there was a ban placed in the first place was because AIDS-infected blood nearly destroyed the entire hemophiliac community.
Dilbert, I am just shocked, shocked I tell you, by your insensitivity. What are a few (hundred?) thousand cases of HIV, Syphilis, Hepatitis C, etc. when compared with the very real danger of a loss of self-esteem amongst the LBGT community, intravenous drug users, and prostitutes?
Next thing you know, imperialistic, gender-normative white men such as yourself would prevent illegal aliens who have (or have had) Dengue Fever or Malaria from selling their precious bodily fluids! For shame!
I guess I need to start wearing a Medi-Bracelet that reads: ‘Let me bleed out.’
I think I may have mentioned this before, but a guy on my dorm floor in college was infected with HIV the same way. He was a hemophiliac and received tainted blood when he was in high school. I don’t know where he is today (or if he is alive), but it weighed on him very heavily back then. Poor guy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.