Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The One Battle Michael Brown’s Family Will Win
TIME ^ | 11/27/2014 | Josh Sanburn

Posted on 11/27/2014 6:58:21 AM PST by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last
Officer Darren Wilson, when asked in an interview whether he was for body cameras, said "YES".

He also added that had it been available when he confronted Michael Brown, it would be additional evidence in his favor.

1 posted on 11/27/2014 6:58:21 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Our police officers have been begging for these.


2 posted on 11/27/2014 7:00:17 AM PST by BlackAdderess
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

They gloss over the fact Michael Brown was a thug.

And Darren Wilson is still the good guy standing.


3 posted on 11/27/2014 7:00:30 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

An amusing side effect is that this will actually cut way down on lawsuit lottos and rabble rousing after shootings - it already has in places car and body cams are already being issued.

Except in Los Angeles, where the cops keep disabling the cameras.


4 posted on 11/27/2014 7:00:44 AM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The One Battle Michael Brown’s Family Will Win


If making Michael Brown look like a thug makes them a winner, sure.

We saw one other video of Michael that day. He was a thug.


5 posted on 11/27/2014 7:01:47 AM PST by boycott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
There was a nice camera shot of the gentle giant harassing the store owner....

And his momma said..."He's 18...we all did silly things when we were 18".

These people are rotten to the core...

6 posted on 11/27/2014 7:03:16 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Body cameras won’t put al, and jessie out of work but it should help.


7 posted on 11/27/2014 7:03:29 AM PST by duffee (Dump the Chairman of the Mississippi Republican Party, joe nosef.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Kind of what I was thinking too. Geez. What if he did have a body camera on during the altercation and it proved that he did exactly what he said and the incident was as described. Oh, CGI’d to make it look like mb was the bad guy. There would still be some BS excuse as to why it wasn’t what it was.


8 posted on 11/27/2014 7:04:31 AM PST by rktman (Served in the Navy to protect "their" rights so they can now try to infringe on mine. Weird huh?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr
...actually cut way down on lawsuit lottos and rabble rousing after shootings

I don't believe this for a minute. They WANT to complain and riot so they can steal, get money and concessions and be panderer to. IOW they want to remain relevant in a society that does not really need them.

9 posted on 11/27/2014 7:04:37 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Isn’t it possible that cameras will not see everything?

Is the cop going to wear the camera lens on a lapel of a shirt, for example? If it’s pointing outward from there, but somebody comes at you from the side to grab your gun, as happened in this case, would the camera even see that part of the incident?

I think that, even if there were cameras, these liberals and race baiters would still find something to bitch about. For example, the story which came out that Brown was charging Wilson when the fatal shots were fired. If this were on video, the liberals would still bitch that Wilson should have run away or stepped aside to keep from being tackled and mauled. They still would have questioned him being shot.

And, as I mentioned, depending on camera angles and clarity of the video, liberals and race baiters would still find something in these encounters which they believe was racist.


10 posted on 11/27/2014 7:12:43 AM PST by Dilbert San Diego (s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

I am not stating a hope or projecting wishful thinking. It is demonstrable fact that cameras *have* cut down on municipal settlements and rioting over police conduct in most jurisdictions that they have been introduced in. It’s so demonstrable that municipal insurance companies are offering discounts for governments that install them.


11 posted on 11/27/2014 7:17:33 AM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

It is possible for the camera not to catch something - but then how are you worse off? If nothing else, the audio record will still likely be there, discrediting ‘witnesses’ that ‘heard’ the officer utter racial slurs.

In my own city of Dallas, there have been similar shootings but when the rabble rousers get started, the video gets released to the news media and everyone calms down.


12 posted on 11/27/2014 7:19:50 AM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I absolutely support this.

Yes, it will curb the abusive behavior by a handful of rogue cops. But, that's not why I support it.

It will end the repeated attempts by people that think they can get attention or money with bogus complaints.

This is what has happened every time a department has deployed cameras.

13 posted on 11/27/2014 7:24:03 AM PST by justlurking (tagline removed, as demanded by Admin Moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

There’s certainly an upside.

Downside is that the activists and liberals will become judge and jury according to how they interpret the scene. What do they think cop could have done to keep perp from kicking the crap out of him?


14 posted on 11/27/2014 7:25:21 AM PST by Kenny (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
.


Michael Brown was a gang-banger "thug" who enjoyed terrorizing people "physically smaller" than his 250-lbs weight of "imbecile horse dung" ...

Indeed, things would have turned-out much different that fateful day ... had the cigar-shop owner been a bad-ass 225-lb Special Forces vet ...

"brave" little Michael Brown would have cowered in fear (and wet himself) if he ever faced a man of his same physical size.


Michael Brown had undoubtedly (many times before) used his 250-lb mass to successfully intimidate LOTS of folks ...

Unfortunately, Michael Brown selected the "wrong non-black guy" to f### with day ...

and it justifiably cost this "idiot-thug" his pathetic life.



The "untold" story line aspect is "how many INNOCENT people did Darren Wilson SAVE from a FUTURE VIOLENT ASSUALT" from the POS Michael Brown ?


.
15 posted on 11/27/2014 7:26:24 AM PST by Patton@Bastogne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind


16 posted on 11/27/2014 7:28:40 AM PST by Brother Cracker (You are more likely to find krugerrands in a Cracker Jack box than 22 ammo at Wal-Mart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
"...liberals and race baiters would still find something in these encounters which they believe was racist."

Exactly. A single football plays has 50 HD cameras on it, and people STILL argue what really happened.

17 posted on 11/27/2014 7:31:08 AM PST by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

It is possible for the camera not to catch something - but then how are you worse off?


I was just trying to say that if the video wasn’t clear, the video didn’t have a good camera angle, the camera was shaking, or things happened off camera, that people would still complain.


18 posted on 11/27/2014 7:31:53 AM PST by Dilbert San Diego (s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Somebody I know in law enforcement told me that they got body cameras in their department - and now the creeps have changed their tune and are howling that cameras are unfair! The cameras film the whole thing, of course, and in several cases, have caught other illegal activities going on in the background, not only exonerating the officer, but leading to more charges for the creeps. Too funny.


19 posted on 11/27/2014 7:33:02 AM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moehoward

Good point about sports. People argue all the time about disputed plays in sports, and you can get different interpretations of a play, depending on the camera angle you were seeing.


20 posted on 11/27/2014 7:35:03 AM PST by Dilbert San Diego (s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson