Uh, but NBC failed to mention that there was no “conflicting accounts” from the forensic evidence gathered at the scene and later by the various police departments and the FBI, and that the grand jury was easily able to determine which witnesses were credible and which were deliberately lying based on the consistency of their stories with the forensic evidence.
NBC also failed to mention how many of they lying witnesses repeatedly changed their stories and then changed them again AFTER their stories were pointed out to them as conflicting with the forensic evidence.
So this wasn’t the simple “he said, she said” story like NBC would like everyone to believe.
NBC has been sinking like the Titanic for years. When it’s finally at the bottom of the ocean let me know.
Exactly. Witnesses can say anythinq, but whatever they say that contradicts the hard evidence is either mistaken or a deliberate lie.
Moreover, the last “conflicting” point was he had his hands up. This was the point of the white house authored piece (of sht).
You are correct. The forensic evidence points to the police mans story and that the other stories were flat out perjury; falsely started out with the perp accomplice who has a history of making false statements to the authorities.
Exactly. We can all see what NBC is doing with this piece.