Posted on 11/24/2014 10:24:01 AM PST by SeekAndFind
The White House’s defenders will attempt to knock down claims that Defense Sec. Chuck Hagel’s resignation is loaded with implications for the future of this administration.
Cabinet officials come and go, they’ll note, but this White House has made a point of standing by its embattled figures. Former Health and Human Services Sec. Kathleen Sebelius resigned in Aril of this year, well after the controversy surrounding the botched debut of Healthcare.gov. Some speculated that the delay was an intentional effort to disassociate her resignation from the controversy that likely hastened it. Similarly, the political press was shocked when Obama went ahead and accepted former Veterans Affairs Sec. Eric Shinseki’s resignation in late May. Observers called it a departure from “a familiar strategy of protecting embattled Cabinet members,” one which signaled the potentially broad political impact of the VA scandal.
The circumstances of Hagel’s resignation are distinct from those above. Hagel had served in the Obama White House for just two years while the above figures were with Obama from 2009 and were considered figures of great importance to the president’s liberal base. Hagel was not a political asset to the White House in the way that his colleagues and predecessors were, and he had the added weakness of being a Republican at the head of the Pentagon. The last figure friendly toward the GOP whom Obama placed at the head of the DoD went about writing a scathing memoir that was highly critical of both the president and vice president almost immediately after leaving that post. This experience, The New York Times report which revealed Hagel’s impending departure indicated, stung the president and stuck with his aides.
The Times also noted that there were many reasons for Hagel’s departure, and some of them are legitimate. The former Republican senator who had been famously critical of America’s expanded global military footprint was to have largely overseen retrenchment of American forces abroad. When that mission changed, and America became embroiled in another war in Iraq and a new war in Syria, Hagel’s role evolved into something for which he was not prepared.
But the announcement that Hagel was to be jettisoned was also accompanied by the requisite spiteful bad-mouthing from anonymous administration sources which has become so commonplace in the Obama era.
On Monday, NBC News reporter Andrea Mitchell revealed that the cast of advisors around Obama was always suspicious of Hagel and his influence on the president’s approach to foreign affairs. “That tight circle never really had a lot of confidence, particularly in Chuck Hagel,” she reported. “Hagel never really proved himself.”
Mitchell also made note of a phenomenon that The Times also observed: The White House was perturbed when Hagel called ISIS an “imminent threat to every interest we have.” Whether this assessment was true or not, that was not what the White House wanted to hear.
“Mr. Hagel has often had problems articulating his thoughts — or administration policy — in an effective manner, and has sometimes left reporters struggling to describe what he has said in news conferences,” The Times reported.
This is all quite unfair. Hagel and other members of the Defense establishment had a bear of a time cleaning up after their president’s routinely impolitic statements about the nature of the ISIS threat.
When, in extemporaneous remarks, Obama told reporters that it was America’s policy to “shrink” ISIS down into a “manageable problem,” it was Hagel who was tapped to clean up those comments. Speaking with CNN reporter Jim Sciutto before an audience of students at the U.S. Naval War College, Hagel insisted that America should dismiss Obama’s off-the-cuff statements and focus only on what he said in his prepared remarks. “No, it’s not contain,” Hagel said of America’s policy toward ISIS. “It’s exactly what the president said: ‘Degrade and destroy.’”
Hagel, the thankless janitor who spent his tenure either cleaning up after Obama’s controversial asides or trying to make sense of the White House’s conflictual approach to foreign affairs, got his reward this week. For Hagel’s part, however, he does not seem prepared to allow the administration to frame him as the problematic element in his relationship with the president. A “senior defense official” told CBS reporter David Martin that Hagel “was fed up with micromanagement from the White House.”
Expect this back and forth in the press to continue, and likely to get worse in the coming weeks.
In the wake of a historic midterm defeat – the second for this administration – the White House has done everything it could to project unfazed strength. It was always ever a front, and the buttresses keeping the edifice of this administration horizontal are starting to buckle. The backbiting that has characterized today’s announcement of the resignation of Hagel is symptomatic of a condition that afflicts every lame duck administration. Despite Obama’s assurances to the contrary, his White House is running out of steam.
RE: RE: How many Secretaries of Defense is this under Obama?
Two down.... how many more to go? Who knows?
____________________
My mistake, actually three down....
Robert Gates, Leon Panetta and Chuck Hagel.
No
It just means Obama’s inner circle a sistas pushed him out
Imagine
america run by an effete black man and 3 black women
My grandfather would never believe the wonderful progress
/bitter dripping clinging venomous sarcasm
Well, I don't know your grandfather, but I know your posts and virtually always nod in support.
But I bet even your fine Grandpa would have been surprised just how right he turned out to be.
Hagel was chosen explicitly chosen to be fired at a convenient time of obama’s choosing. He has changed the subject from the invasion. He has changed the subject from the obama/iranian negotiations. Hagel was also meant to be sacrificed.
Then I certainly defer to your first hand knowledge.
No, Hagel’s ouster was a classic Soviet-style purge. He’s lucky he wasn’t sent to Guantanamo as an Enemy of the State.
As Charles Krauthammer recently observed, Obama will suffer incompetence and cluelessness, but not criticism.
The initial announcement yesterday morning or early afternoon said it was NOT a resignation. Now during the day it seems to change.
Clearly, it was not voluntary resignation on his part. If not a firing it was a forced resignation.
Like everything else in this presidency, this appointment reflects mediocrity.
I feel your pain and anger, but part of me is with your other side...ie... let it burn. Let this man continue to enrage us to the point that it engages us as it did during the Carter years.
We need a Ronald Reagan to rise from the ashes. Who can it be? Rick Perry or some other governor. I can’t see us hitching to another Senator as they are political in everything they do. We need a leader, a doer, a person strong enough to take on the public unions and slice the federal gov’t bare, focusing solely on our national defense.
My grandfather was a rich man in Jackson Mississippi in the war years who made his fortune building military bases in the buildup and war years
He had 100s of black employees and they were always around our homes families from cooks to drivers to skilled labor to horse training and deer camp work
As the whole segregation thing was reaching a boil he took a moderate tack and elevated some to supervisory slots and refused to join the popular uptown Klan.....The Citizens Council
We even were friendly with Charlie Evers and Aaron Henry and attended Vernon Dahmers funeral.....
But watching it all turn to crap he warned before his death in early 60s that Generosity breeds dependence breeds resentment beers ultimately contempt
My dad echoed the same sentiment
They were right.
Sounds positively Faulknerian, in every complicated and interesting sense.
I have spent only a little time in the South, primarily in Mississippi (this was some 20 years ago already) and I was clueless and awkward but I felt the power, the soul of the place pervading me.
I still remember it with great wonder and fondness.
Yes, the older ones saw the trouble coming, didn’t they? Although they probably didn’t see the cynicism or the viciousness (or even the sheer numbers) of those bringing it on.
This administration was a hot mess from the moment Barry tapped Joe Biden as his running mate.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.