Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Immigration Reform Control Act of 1986 "NOTICE TO CONGRESS BEFORE IMPLEMENTING CHANGES" (Required)
Government Printing Office ^ | 1986 | US Congress

Posted on 11/22/2014 4:03:19 PM PST by xzins

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last

1 posted on 11/22/2014 4:03:20 PM PST by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All; Jim Robinson

Either the Congress was informed months (years) ago of these changes (and has been playing us), or the President must await Congressional Review of Major Changes.


2 posted on 11/22/2014 4:03:53 PM PST by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Is this like ‘notice to Congress’ before releasing 5 Taliban commanders from GITMO?


3 posted on 11/22/2014 4:06:48 PM PST by Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America

What it is is grounds for a suit before the Supreme Court.


4 posted on 11/22/2014 4:07:52 PM PST by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: xzins

In all of the raised voices from congress critters on this subject, I have seen no one mention this.

Which begs the question:

Does congress actually know the law?


5 posted on 11/22/2014 4:08:46 PM PST by old curmudgeon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: old curmudgeon

They do not read or write the laws they pass.


6 posted on 11/22/2014 4:09:54 PM PST by chris37 (heartless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: old curmudgeon

I’ve been looking at the law the last few hours and ran across this section.

Doesn’t it say that Congress has on the order of 2 YEARS to review major changes?


7 posted on 11/22/2014 4:10:43 PM PST by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: xzins

come now Obama read previous laws. remeber he is graduate from Harvard. Even the store clerks in Cambridge Masachusetts know that either the Harvard and MIT students cannot either read or do math. So Obummer had someone else read this for him. Joe Biden or Bo the dog, you know either one of them has more smarts than Obama. Look Biden gets led around, just like BO the dog.


8 posted on 11/22/2014 4:11:28 PM PST by hondact200 (Candor dat viribos alas (sincerity gives wings to strength) and Nil desperandum (never despair))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
States can go directly to the Supremes for an injunction for an unlawful EO affecting them.

The Congress can't.

/johnny

9 posted on 11/22/2014 4:12:00 PM PST by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

Boehner is suing over ObamaCare. Where is he suing at?


10 posted on 11/22/2014 4:12:42 PM PST by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: chris37

I understand that.

Neither do I write the traffic laws, but it is not an excuse for getting caught doing 100 MPH on the interstate.

This story should have been posted by some congress critter, not by someone here with a screen name.

All the more credit to him.

He should ber in congress.


11 posted on 11/22/2014 4:13:27 PM PST by old curmudgeon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: xzins
District Court, I believe. The one for DC.

/johnny

12 posted on 11/22/2014 4:17:20 PM PST by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: xzins
What it is is grounds for a suit before the Supreme Court.

Wait until chief jester, er I mean, chief justice Juan Roberts puts his interpretation to those grounds.

13 posted on 11/22/2014 4:17:32 PM PST by Know et al (Keep on Freepin'!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

Then sue the Obamstard there!


14 posted on 11/22/2014 4:18:04 PM PST by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: xzins
"(ii) CONGRESSIONAL ACTION.—No major change may be implemented unless the Congress specifically provides, in an appropriations or other Act, for funds for implementation of the change.

Seems to spell it out very clearly, including funding.

15 posted on 11/22/2014 4:18:07 PM PST by jazusamo (0bama to go 'full-Mussolini' after elections: Mark Levin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Know et al; P-Marlowe

Even John Roberts will have trouble turning “2 Years time to review a major change” into a tax.


16 posted on 11/22/2014 4:19:32 PM PST by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: xzins

DC Circuit Court


17 posted on 11/22/2014 4:21:15 PM PST by Ray76 (When Obama speaks he speaks as the leader of a foreign invasion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Nope. That's a long wait where a train don't come.

It needs to go to the Supremes, if there is an unlawful EO.

Otherwise, run the clock out on this congress, and let the next Senate pass one of the already passed House immigration bills and send it to Obama.

Right now, Obama is no closer to amnesty than he was a month ago. But he sure did rattle a lot of cages with his yapping.

/johnny

18 posted on 11/22/2014 4:21:32 PM PST by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: old curmudgeon

No. Did they read Obamacare?


19 posted on 11/22/2014 4:22:04 PM PST by Kackikat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: xzins
I sure hope you are right!

It's hard for me to have confidence in the SC any more, not that I had all that much before.

20 posted on 11/22/2014 4:22:16 PM PST by Know et al (Keep on Freepin'!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson