Posted on 11/22/2014 4:03:19 PM PST by xzins
"(3) NOTICE TO CONGRESS BEFORE IMPLEMENTING CHANGES.—
"(A) IN GENERAL.—The President may not implement any change under paragraph (1) unless at least—
"(i) 60 days,
"(ii) one year, in the case of a major change described in subparagraph (D)(iii), or
"(iii) two years, in the case of a major change described in clause (i) or (ii) of subparagraph (D), before the date of implementation of the change, the President has prepared and transmitted to the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives and to the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate a written report setting forth the proposed change. If the President proposes to make any change regarding social security account number cards, the President shall transmit to the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives and to the Committee on Finance of the Senate a written report setting forth the proposed change. The President promptly shall cause to have printed in the Federal Register the substance of any major change (described in subparagraph (D)) proposed and reported to Congress.
"(B) CONTENTS OF REPORT.—In any report under subparagraph (A) the President shall include recommendations for the establishment of civil and criminal sanctions for unauthorized use or disclosure of the information or identifiers contained in such system.
"(C) CONGRESSIONAL REVIEW OF MAJOR CHANGES.—
"(i) HEARINGS AND REVIEW.—The Committees on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives and of the Senate shall cause to have printed in the Congressional Record the substance of any major change described in subparagraph (D), shall hold hearings respecting the feasibility and desirability of implementing such a change, and, within the two year period before implementation, shall report to their respective Houses findings on whether or not such a change should be implemented.
"(ii) CONGRESSIONAL ACTION.—No major change may be implemented unless the Congress specifically provides, in an appropriations or other Act, for funds for implementation of the change.
"(D) MAJOR CHANGES REQUIRING TWO YEARS NOTICE AND CONGRESSIONAL REVIEW.—As used in this paragraph, the term 'major change' means a change which would—
"(i) require an individual to present a new card or other document (designed specifically for use for this purpose) at the time of hiring, recruitment, or referral,
"(ii) provide for a telephone verification system under which an employer, recruiter, or referrer must transmit to a Federal official information concerning the immigration status of prospective employees and the official transmits to the person, and the person must record, a verification code, or
"(iii) require any change in any card used for accounting purposes under the Social Security Act, 42 USC 301 note. including any change requiring that the only social security account number cards which may be presented in order to comply with subsection (bXlXCXi) are such cards as are in a counterfeit-resistant form consistent with the second sentence of section 205(cX2XD) of the Social ecurity Act. 42 use 405.
,; "(E) GENERAL REVENUE FUNDING OF SOCIAL SECURITY CARD CHANGES.—Any costs incurred in developing and implementing any change described in subparagraph (D) (iii)for purposes of this subsection shall not be paid for out of any trust fund established under established under the Social Security Act.
Ronald Reagan landmine in ‘86 kills any ID printing of illegals without 2 years’ notice!
Now we have to wonder who all knew about this in congress before zero probed the defenses... this really should be breaking at Drudge, IMO!
And Dana Perino, on FNC the other day defending zero as being perfectly inside the law!
Might I suggest Judge Jeanine?
I would suggest Bret Baier.
It is time to arrest Obama and put him where he won’t do more damage to America.
Like in the color ball cage at McDonald’s somewhere in South Chicago.
Realize, Fox News has been in the tank for "immigration reform" for quite some time. Judge Jeaninie's show airs on the weekend. She is more disposed toward making of this what it should be before and can get it done before management (arriving back to work on Monday) can spike it.
If she blows the whistle, Baier can't ignore it the next day. Pirro is a former judge, fully capable of interpreting the law reliably for Fox and then distributing it in such a way that it won't be ignored.
Typically famous leaders assume the mantle of leader and by their wise, exceptional and consequential leadership they earn the respect, praise and accolades that are part of the judgment of history and which follow them into the future as a part of history.
This is how it's been done from the days of Alexander the Great to more recent consequential leaders like President Ronald Reagan.
Obama did things in reverse.
He was given all of the respect , praise and accolades before he even took office, some of which was awarded to him by himself personally.
As time goes on, the respect has evaporated, the praise has died and the accolades are bing revoked by the judgment of history
I heard that with Perino. I figured she had just dropped a tab of Purple Haze before the show. The girl had to be hallucinating herself back into GW Bush amnesty days or something.
I just found it and posted it a few hours ago.
It struck me as important when I read it.
Know that. Great find.
It struck me as important when I read it.
It is, particularly because it betrays the DOJ-White Hut relationship as one of conspiracy to defraud via Zero's claim that 'this is all legal.' What you have here not only buys time, but it sets him on his heels defending that assertion against this statute, but only if cited and propagated widely.
Jeanine Pirro would jump on this because it IS such a huge scoop, she's a hard no-nonsense type, and the Sunday night time slot she occupies is a wasteland. News of this will get lawyers rifling through the rest of this law by which to realize that this "system is broken" meme is a huge farce. The problem is enforcement, as we have always known.
Great job.
Is her show live or pre-taped? I’ll send it to her, but if it’s pre-taped, we’ll not hear from her until next Saturday.
The show is on now so it's probably too late (I thought it only aired Sundays). In which case we may be stuck there. Sorry.
Off the top of my head, I can't think of any of the Sunday crew that would run with this or stick it in somebody's face.
She takes live facebook and twitter comments
Ping
Freepers have been looking for the EO to appear on the WH web page.
There was a post earlier today by “Hostage”. Below is a quick summary that Liz wrote at post 37.
Thread - read the poster comment
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3229663/posts
Great point.
Where is this E/O? There is a summary on the White House Website but no signed order. Without the signed E/O, states may find it difficult to proceed in the Courts. It is probable that Obama’s people know that a signed E/O can be used as the basis for states’ court action.....possibly the Obama people are tying up court action by not issuing and officially signed E/O.
37 posted on 11/22/2014, 6:33:03 AM by Liz
Other important posts
#6
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3229663/posts?page=6#6
#15
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3229663/posts?page=15#15
I don’t facebook or twitter
I sent it anyway. You never know who will see it.
Who are the real rabble rousers at Fox:
Dobbs, Cavuto, McGirk, Waters, Ingraham,
What do you think?
do u think this will be the basis for the OK/TX suit? Abbott sure seems confident on this...
(d) EVALUATION AND CHANGES IN EMPLOYMENT VERIFICATION SYSTEM.—
(1) PRESIDENTIAL MONITORING AND IMPROVEMENTS IN SYSTEM
(A) MONITORING.—The President shall provide for the monitoring and evaluation of the degree to which the employment verification system established etc
(2) RESTRICTIONS ON CHANGES IN SYSTEM.—Any change the President proposes to implement under paragraph (1) in the verification system must be designed in a manner so the verification system, as so changed, meets the following requirements: etc
(3) NOTICE TO CONGRESS BEFORE IMPLEMENTING CHANGES.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The President may not implement any change under paragraph (1) unless at least— etc.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.