Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Servant of the Cross

I hated this article - queasy thesis, wrong conclusion. He connected some dots correctly, but whiffed on a bunch.


3 posted on 11/19/2014 5:17:30 AM PST by C. Edmund Wright (www.FireKarlRove.com NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: C. Edmund Wright

I hated this article - queasy thesis, wrong conclusion.
_________________________________________________

I call the weak brained analysis verbal gymnastics. I do not care how they characterize it, forcing someone to buy something under duress, which means you are using state action to steal his personal property, has to be unconstitutional.


34 posted on 11/19/2014 6:12:27 AM PST by iontheball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson