I hated this article - queasy thesis, wrong conclusion.
_________________________________________________
I call the weak brained analysis verbal gymnastics. I do not care how they characterize it, forcing someone to buy something under duress, which means you are using state action to steal his personal property, has to be unconstitutional.
Isn’t that what every tax does? We are “forced” to buy fire trucks, police uniforms, road graders...and pay people to use them. If you fail to pay, what happens?
yes, verbal gymnastics...intellectual gymnastics too - he was trying to be too smart by half.