What Executive Actions Should a Conservative Dictator Take?

self | November 16, 2014 | self

[Don W]

A LINK that lists all EO's. I left it on 1870, but there is a drop down menu for any year you wish to see.

You're welcome.

[SuperLuminal]

EEO #1: Immediate castration for any male showing support for the demoncrats...

EEO #2: Disarm all federal employees who are not specified as law enforcement officers under the former Constitution...

EEO #3: Immediately abolish all laws and regulations not specifically called for under the former Constitution...

EEO #4: Reintroduce the former Constitution as the basis for reestablishing the former Republic...

[RoadGumby]

But it Would be conservative to use ‘established’ precedent and powers to slash the govt and re establish the constitutional republic. That is what this conservative would do. With extreme prejudice.

[Hugh the Scot]

It seems that would be the opposite of taking dictatorial power.

[RoadGumby]

I would most assurredly take as much dictatorial power as i could to destroy this marxist nightmare we are sliding into. Just remove parts of this govt by executive order and decree until there is little left that isnt constitutional.

[The_Media_never_lie]

Thank you.

[DoodleDawg]

Something legal President Walker could do on the first day is repeal the executive order allowing federal employees to be unionized. Poof, there goes union money set aside for democrats.

That would be the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978, not any executive order.

[OneHun]

"Do you not deny that if Obama initiates executive amnesty, he will be acting as a dictator? Imagine a patriotic Obama, acting unilaterally in the interests of the country."

1.  He is a wicked and racist man and yes, his action would be dictatorial.

2. I can't imagine a patriotic Obama, but to answer your question an unilateral action in the interest of the country would be to uphold the Constitution with its original meaning.  That, I would call patriotic.  

 

[The_Media_never_lie]

I can't imagine a patriotic Obama,

After I wrote the comment, I thought Patriotic Obama? What a contradiction, or total oxymoron! He is one leader that has ALWAYS took sides against the American interest, with the one exception I can think of as killing OBL, or authorizing drone strikes.

If we, due to the dilution of American voters by the importation of non-Americans cannot vote in another leader who will look out for American interests, then a long, painful decline is inevitable. In that case, a patriotic strong man or woman may be desirable.

Democrats and Republicans have a vested interest, not just in looking out for themselves and their cronies, but in making good decisions, i.e. securing the border, handling debt, maintaining a strong military, restoring American industry and jobs, etc. in order to prevent this from happening.

[The_Media_never_lie]

Correction: He is one leader that has ALWAYS taken sides against the American interest

[OneHun]

Unfortunately for us your concerns and observations are right.  With a lot of effort we might be able to put a Conservative/TeaParty type of person in the WH who aggressively will undo the damage while implementing the right policies for the country, so much so, that the Left will never be able to undo it. 

[Hugh the Scot]

I completely understand. Dictatorially relinquishing power.