Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama: Regulate broadband Internet like a utility so it 'works for everyone'
c/net ^ | November 10, 2014 | Don Reisinger

Posted on 11/10/2014 11:38:48 AM PST by LucianOfSamasota

President Obama urged the US government to adopt tighter regulations on broadband service in an effort to preserve "a free and open Internet."

In a statement released Monday, Obama called on the Federal Communications Commission to enforce the principle of treating all Internet traffic the same way, known in shorthand as Net neutrality. That means treating broadband services like utilities, the president said, so that Internet service providers would be unable "to restrict the best access or to pick winners and losers in the online marketplace for services and ideas."

Obama wades into a contentious debate that has raged over how to treat Internet traffic, which has only heated up as the FCC works to prepare an official guideline. Those rules were expected to be made available later this year, though reports now claim they may be delayed until early 2015. The debate has centered on whether broadband should be placed under Title II regulation under the Telecommunications Act, which already tightly controls phone services.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnet.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: internet; netneutrality
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-167 next last
To: LucianOfSamasota

I hate to sathis but Obama is right on this one. And this is not new regulation, it’s the current rule, established long before Obama was president. The internet providers are pushing to make you pay more to get the services you want.


21 posted on 11/10/2014 11:56:28 AM PST by Minsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter
The problem is that the big ISPs want to pick what sites you can use.
... Want FR? Sorry, that's only available as part of our extended package.

That's complete bunk. The only thing the "big ISPs" want to do is charge more for bandwidth hogging content like streaming HD. Sites like FR that use 1/100 or 1/1000 of the bandwidth will not be throttled in any way.

It is only the agitators from the gimme crowd and the big streaming media outlets that want this "regulation".

22 posted on 11/10/2014 11:56:41 AM PST by palmer (Minnesota Is Monitoring 48 for Ebola, Already 12 Go Missing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik

Obamaphones have internet.


23 posted on 11/10/2014 11:57:32 AM PST by Ray76 (We must destroy the Uniparty or be destroyed by them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: LucianOfSamasota
"in an effort to preserve a free and open internet"

"Free" and "Open" are two concepts that do not apply to the current administration. Not buying this.

24 posted on 11/10/2014 11:59:01 AM PST by Pajamajan ( Pray for our nation. Thank the Lord for everything you have. Don't wait. Do it today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LucianOfSamasota

Obviously he has polling data that says Millenials stayed home because they were PO-ed at him for playing footsie with this.


25 posted on 11/10/2014 12:00:24 PM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter

Like obamaphones and obamacare, it will turn into more redistribution of wealth. The payers will be picking up the tabs for society’s sponges (democrats).

The poor deserve equal access to the Internet .... and then more yada .... yada .... yada.


26 posted on 11/10/2014 12:00:58 PM PST by boycott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Minsc

“The internet providers are pushing to make you pay more to get the services you want.”

Cant have that. Price controls are the way to go! //////////////////////sssssssssssssss


27 posted on 11/10/2014 12:01:39 PM PST by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Col Frank Slade

It won’t be long before the “redistributors of wealth” have everything under their control.

They’ve now got healthcare, communications (obamaphones), government, education, etc.


28 posted on 11/10/2014 12:03:21 PM PST by boycott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: LucianOfSamasota

Obama should regulate his damn mouth and recognize he is basically an Administrator and not a legislator. If he wanted to enact laws he should have stayed in Congress.


29 posted on 11/10/2014 12:03:29 PM PST by ZULU (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8qLDFiQcjlY Impeach Obama in 2015 !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter

“Want Netflix? Yeah that’s extra.
Want sports sites. Buy our sports package.
Want FR? Sorry, that’s only available as part of our extended package. “

And can you point to where exactly they are doing this?

I don’t want some passed around internet myth, I want to see the exact ISP that is working to sort out over a billion websites into tier packages as if the internet is the same as cable TV.


30 posted on 11/10/2014 12:04:18 PM PST by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: LucianOfSamasota
Obama: Regulate broadband Internet like a utility so it 'works for everyone'

English Translation: Obama: Regulate broadband Internet like a utility so we can tax you and so we can control what you think, speak or say.

31 posted on 11/10/2014 12:06:52 PM PST by Bubba_Leroy (The Obamanation Continues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WorkingClassFilth

I think “free” is the key word — means no cost.

Democrats have been trying to make Internet access free to people on welfare, etc. I presume that that means giving them a free computer too.


32 posted on 11/10/2014 12:09:57 PM PST by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: LucianOfSamasota
Our little corporal hates e-samizdat. In order for it to be more free, it must be tightly regulated with harsh penalties. Samizdat (Russian: самизда́т; IPA: [səmɨzˈdat]) was a key form of dissident activity across the Soviet bloc in which individuals reproduced censored publications by hand and passed the documents from reader to reader. This grassroots practice to evade officially imposed censorship was fraught with danger as harsh punishments were meted out to people caught possessing or copying censored materials.
33 posted on 11/10/2014 12:14:14 PM PST by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LucianOfSamasota
"adopt tighter regulations on broadband service in an effort to preserve "a free and open Internet."

Does Obolo really think Ameicans don't recognize a contridictory statement like that? Next stop....Police State.

34 posted on 11/10/2014 12:16:03 PM PST by catfish1957 (Everything I needed to know about Islam was written on 11 Sep 2001)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik

Be wary of bull feces spread by the internet providers. I personally know one of the people who was one of the designers of the internet, and they designed it to be content neutral and strenuously opposed what the carriers want to do.
The end of net neutrality will just cost YOU more.


35 posted on 11/10/2014 12:17:21 PM PST by Minsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

Here are 2 things O will say

“Its the right thing to do”

and “These folks all need to use the internet”

Since young people are more internet savvy maybe they will get a bit more of a clue what he is all about


36 posted on 11/10/2014 12:18:34 PM PST by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik
And can you point to where exactly they are doing this?

Example off the top of my head? How about AT&T's attempted blocking of FaceTime/Hangouts?
Link

Net neutrality isn't about giving anyone anything for free; it's about not letting ISPs choose what you can consume. It's about making ISPs "dumb pipes" for the internet and allowing people to choose what they use that bandwidth for.

No one is suggesting that the heavy Netflix user pay the same rate as the bandwidth sipper, but that they both have access to the same services. The general Republican lack of understanding on this issue is not helping bring young conservatives into the fold. They look clueless and out of touch.

37 posted on 11/10/2014 12:20:34 PM PST by zoso82t
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: LucianOfSamasota

Sounds like obammy is going to make workers pay for the worthless to have internet.


38 posted on 11/10/2014 12:20:49 PM PST by Joe Boucher (The F.B.I. Is a division of holders Justice Dept. (Nuff said))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ray76
This is Obama’s latest assault on freedom.

We spent 40 years on the cold war to prevent socialism, and we end up getting it via an inside job?

Khrushchev is in hell right now lauging his ass off.

39 posted on 11/10/2014 12:20:55 PM PST by catfish1957 (Everything I needed to know about Islam was written on 11 Sep 2001)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter

Utter bullshit and lies. None of that is true. What ISP is keeping you from accessing free republic?


40 posted on 11/10/2014 12:21:04 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-167 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson