Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Does Kim Kardashian have her eye on your bottom?
Guardian UK ^ | 30 October 2014 | Alexis Petridis

Posted on 11/08/2014 7:47:54 PM PST by Lorianne

Kim Kardashian is angry at a woman the piece refers to as “internet bottom sensation” Jen Selter. Selter has been posting photographs of her large buttocks on Instagram, an activity Kardashian apparently feels is an unacceptable infringement upon her very raison d’etre: one of the gangplanks of Kim Kardashian’s global celebrity being her nonpareil ability to take photographs of her own large buttocks with a cameraphone.

“Kim thinks Jen copies all her poses … she is fuming as she feels her curvy bum is one of her most unique selling points and feels that Jen is just trying to cash in.”

“Insiders say Kim has sought legal advice to see if they can stop Jen,” it read, raising the very real possibility that, somewhere in California, a crack team of lawyers may at this very moment be working around the clock to copyright buttocks on behalf of Kim Kardashian.

You may say this is an entirely ridiculous scenario – we are all, God willing, born with buttocks, Kanye West’s wife can’t just carry on as if she personally invented the concept of having an arse. To which Lost in Showbiz can only respond: do you know how much money these people have? They can bankroll the best legal minds in America! Frankly, if anyone can copyright the concept of buttocks, it’s the West-Kardashians.

Lost in Showbiz envisages a dystopian future, in which no man or woman is legally allowed to have buttocks without first applying to Kim Kardashian for a licence: those unable to produce the right documentation on request forced to suffer the horrifying consequences. Terrorism, ebola, now Kim Kardashian quite literally trying to pinch our arses: can 2014 get any worse?

(Excerpt) Read more at theguardian.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: goddess; hottie; kardashian
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 last
Think a bit darker & a LOT bigger
81 posted on 11/09/2014 8:52:17 AM PST by mikrofon (Kim Gordassian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Jarhead9297

“I’d hit it ;-)”

Make sure you are up to date on your rabies shot before you go anywhere near that.


82 posted on 11/09/2014 11:06:25 AM PST by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SaraJohnson

Ha!


83 posted on 11/09/2014 11:49:22 AM PST by Jarhead9297
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: caww

I remember seeing her for the first time during the OJ Simpson trial. There was a video of her father, Robert Kardashian, leaving the courthouse with Kim walking beside him. What I saw it, I said, “Oh, my. She’s going to be a gorgeous woman when she grows up!” I was wrong.


84 posted on 11/09/2014 12:02:49 PM PST by lonevoice (Life is short. Make fun of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: caww

Well, it isn’t padding. Kim’s bare behind (don’t look if you’re squeamish):

http://pagesix.com/2014/11/11/kim-kardashian-shows-off-her-bootyful-bare-behind/?_ga=1.8970933.1201118765.1395362935


85 posted on 11/12/2014 7:15:24 PM PST by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy

Armenians may be white to the US census, but not to many of us who have lived among and dealt with them...


86 posted on 11/12/2014 8:17:22 PM PST by Clemenza (Lurking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza

Well I can think of 3-4 famous ones who have an insatiable appetite for boudin négre
And are handsomely rewarded slatterns of the lowest order


87 posted on 11/13/2014 10:58:03 AM PST by wardaddy (todays republicans are worse than reconstruction era.....and that takes effort)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy

Pippa Middleton has got it going on.


88 posted on 11/13/2014 11:04:43 AM PST by AppyPappy (If you are not part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

Yes

I am of the age where Pippas or Kylie Minogues butt is the ideal

Think Joey Heatherton or Laugh In era Goldie Shawn....whose daughter too has nice ass

Kardashian aside from her extreme skankiness has a huge jelly prone ass

Its a reflection of the Latino and Afro influences growing inmefia culture

Even Brasil where las nagas rule the ideal ass is less than Kardashian or Jennifer Lopez...whose butt is smaller even than pear shaped Kardashian

Just like today’s size 10 was a 4 in the 60s


89 posted on 11/13/2014 1:51:51 PM PST by wardaddy (todays republicans are worse than reconstruction era.....and that takes effort)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: lonevoice

We’ve got OJ to blame for the whole d@mn mess, LOL.


90 posted on 11/13/2014 1:53:06 PM PST by nascarnation (Impeach, Convict, Deport)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy

Goldie Hawn BTW


91 posted on 11/13/2014 2:31:36 PM PST by AppyPappy (If you are not part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Lizavetta
Maybe she has had surgery but her in most of these pictures it is shown photoshopped, spanxed, taped, lifted, whatever.

Very often, the Daily Mail publishes pictures of her headed to the gym or wherever and it's a whole different butt. It looks like a welfare momma's dorito eating, beer drinking big, fat, spread out butt.

92 posted on 11/13/2014 2:36:51 PM PST by riri (Obama's Amerika--Not a fun place.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

Droid keyboard X Old Brain

Not for sissies


93 posted on 11/13/2014 5:47:26 PM PST by wardaddy (todays republicans are worse than reconstruction era.....and that takes effort)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson