You mistook my critique of this article as some slight against the subject, perhaps. In fact, it was a critique against the writer - whatever his motives.
I have also regularly compiled research reports throughout my career, and frankly, this article is aimless - the credibility and forthrightness of the subject notwithstanding.
> I have also regularly compiled research reports throughout my career, and frankly, this article is aimless - the credibility and forthrightness of the subject notwithstanding.
I’m hoping the writer’s motives were simply to inform. Its hard to find objective new itch out a hint of propaganda anymore (or maybe that’s just my rose colored glasses getting in the way)...: )