Posted on 11/05/2014 9:58:55 AM PST by Yashcheritsiy
To begin with, this election was, generally speaking, a rejection of the notion being advanced by many in the establishment wing of the Party that the Republicans needs to move to the Left on social issues like abortion and gay “marriage.” Earlier this year, GOP establishment leaders like Kevin McCarthy and Paul Ryan announced their plan to begin trying to recruit “Young Gun” candidates – socially liberal, and often homosexual, candidates to run under the Republican banner in an effort to “broaden the appeal” of the Party, especially to younger, socially liberal voters. John Boehner backed this effort, throwing money at the candidates who had been recruited to run this year. However, the voters who were supposed to be impressed by the GOP’s lurch to the Left on “individual choice” issues instead reacted with a collective yawn. In the race for the open seat in Massachusetts’ 6th congressional district, “Young Gun” Richard Tisei - a gay Republican who has a 100% rating from NARAL and Planned Parenthood, who (obviously) supports gay “marriage,” and who is “married” to his “partner” - lost by 15 points to a non-incumbent and relatively unknown Democrat. To give this some perspective, Tisei had ran for the same seat in 2012 against a well-known and long-time incumbent and lost by only a single point. It does not appear that Tisei’s choice to flaunt his peculiar lifestyle choice did him or the GOP any favors this time around...
(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...
This lines up with FReeper conservative principles?!
I think that's the first time I've been asked that question.
Why do you ask?
Why don’t you answer it?
And a misspelling in the first paragraph. Tsk-tsk.
Right. lol
I think my post #100, along with many by other FReepers does just that.
It appears she falls in line politically with many here, if you care to examine what she said.
I've examined it, and I totally reject the entire "Big Tent" approach to conservatism.
Would we be expected to accept an abortionist who happens to agree with us on fiscal matters and foreign affairs?
Homosexuality mental disorder which a person CHOOSES to engage in, this was universally accepted by the medical and psychological communities until the 1970s. The "normalization" and proliferation of homosexuality is part of the left's agenda to destroy America, to pretend otherwise is perilous.
Was this meant to be an example of something this poster has said, or a generic example of what we're talking about?
Gay trolling has been around awhile.
Which was my point.
It's not that complicated, Darksheare isn't asking for you to explain quantum physics, he's simply asking for your thought on homosexuality, same-sex "marriage" and the propaganda behind them.
**********************
Well said!
Usually when I ask that, people suddenly find their fingers are broken.
http://freerepublic.com/focus/news/1198505/posts?page=12#12
http://freerepublic.com/focus/news/1198505/posts?page=39#39
Many times a poster's thoughts reveal more about the poster than the subject, and it appears to be the case here.
I suspect you and I think more alike than you might imagine.
If there's a difference, it's that I feel no need to engage in cyber stalking...and I think it's unbelievably rude.
Look, throw a flag on me, and if Jim decides I'm in the wrong, I'll cheerfully shut up on this forum.
I'm not criticizing the opinion held on gays, I'm criticizing the manner he chose to express it.
I fanatic is a person who won't change the subject, AND WON'T SHUT UP.
As for you...I find it amazing that, since I don't agree with you on the subject of manners, I must be ignorant of everything going on on the world in regard to orientation.
That, also, reveals a lot more about you than the issue. And...it's not complimentary.
It was so much easier back in the days when anti-FReepers wanted to tell us how they really felt and get zotted.
Again, WHAT ARE YOUR THOUGHTS ON HOMOSEXUAL MARRIAGE, HOMOSEXUALITY, AND THE PURE PROPAGANDA BS THEY PUT OUT?
Not a difficult question to answer.
Seems you just answered the last portion with your post 133...
Yeah, much easier.
And old Jerry, I’d asked him his thoughts on the subject, his response was a nonresponse.
Which he then answered..to someone else.
http://freerepublic.com/tag/by:axlebookmite/index?tab=comments;brevity=full;options=no-change
Then you have the MARRIED GAY FURRY who trolled us awhile back.
http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2353144/posts?page=54#54
I see what you did there...
It appears she falls in line politically with many here...
I read that thread and it seemed to be a reasonable question. More than anything I noticed some FReepers had their rear end hanging out, so to speak.
What a pantload. So, a point blank question for you.
Do you support the homosexual agenda.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.