Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mitt Romney’s Pumped Up: If the Republicans Win the Senate, Amnesty Will Pass!
The Rush Limbaugh Show ^ | 3 November 2014 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 11/03/2014 5:14:40 PM PST by COBOL2Java

BEGIN TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Mitt Romney: If the Republicans win the Senate, we'll get amnesty, and he is happy about it. If Republicans win the Senate, we're gonna get amnesty! (clapping) He's clapping his hands. You want to hear it? Grab audio sound bite 15. Sunday morning, Fox News Sunday. Chris Wallace said, "The Senate, on a bipartisan basis, passed comprehensive immigration reform. House Republicans blocked it. So what?"

ROMNEY: You're gonna see a provision, first of all, to secure the border; second of all, to deal with those who've come here illegally; and third, to make sure that our immigration policies are more open and transparent to the many people who do want to come here legally. That's gonna happen. You're gonna see a bill actually reach the desk of the president if we finally have someone besides Harry Reid sitting in the Senate.

RUSH: He said it; you heard it. The establishment Republicans must actually believe that we're all chomping at the bit for the president finally to get a comprehensive immigration bill he could sign. They must think we really, really want this. They must think we're really frustrated out here. They must think that we want to win the Senate so that we can get an immigration bill -- which, of course, secures the border first.

Right, right, right, right, right.

There's other news about all of that and that kind of thing. I've got a whole Stack. Polling data... I don't want to tease it. I'll just get to it. But you'll... (interruption) After all that good news, I had to do it, because that sets up what's coming next. Heads up. The Republicans are running around... This is in Politico. But the Republicans are the source.

The Republicans are running around saying (summarized), "If we win, if Mitch McConnell wins and if all these establishment Republicans win, that means Republican Party is casting aside the Tea Party. That means mainline, Republican establishment, moderate policies are what Republican voters want." That's what they're setting up to say.

END TRANSCRIPT


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: rush
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 last
To: Lady Heron
Someone tell me how evil I am for not voting for the lesser of two evils.

Not to worry; for a response is probably being crafted this very moment, blaming YOU and your ilk for giving us OBAMA by NOT voting for Romney!

61 posted on 11/04/2014 4:23:44 AM PST by Elsie ( Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java
Who's side is this guy on? Is he trying to get Republicans and Conservatives to Not Vote?
My guess is that he is the smartest person in the room, while he's the only one in the room.
62 posted on 11/04/2014 4:34:51 AM PST by MaxMax (Pay Attention and you'll be pissed off too! FIRE BOEHNER, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bramps
I’m not a Romney fan and I love Rush but Rush is wrong here. Romney has always wanted the illegals out and his full comments make that clear:

From which side of his mouth did he make those comments?

63 posted on 11/04/2014 4:48:58 AM PST by COBOL2Java (I'm a Christian, pro-life, pro-gun, Reaganite. The GOP hates me. Why should I vote for them?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Pining_4_TX

“Ah, the Grammar Queen appreciates your post. Now if we could just stop people from saying, “I could care less.”

“Irregardless” (grin)


64 posted on 11/04/2014 5:08:45 AM PST by headstamp 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

From which side of his mouth did he make those comments?
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

The disheartening thing here is that he made the comments in the same interview Rush ‘selectively’ chose the comments he quoted (and then you passed on without checking the entire interview).

This was not an honorable thing for anyone to do. It’s effectively lying and that should bother anyone who realizes that without integrity any political movement is worth nothing.


65 posted on 11/04/2014 5:57:34 AM PST by bramps (Go West America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: bramps
This was not an honorable thing for anyone to do.

I agree. Romney is not an honorable man.

66 posted on 11/04/2014 5:59:06 AM PST by COBOL2Java (I'm a Christian, pro-life, pro-gun, Reaganite. The GOP hates me. Why should I vote for them?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

Sarcasm. The defense of the weak.


67 posted on 11/04/2014 6:03:17 AM PST by bramps (Go West America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana

Everything bad will be in it.


68 posted on 11/04/2014 7:48:06 AM PST by stephenjohnbanker (The only people in the world who fear Obama are American citizens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

I’ll listen out and see what he does!


69 posted on 11/04/2014 7:50:55 AM PST by AnAmericanMother (Ecce Crucem Domini, fugite partes adversae. Vicit Leo de Tribu Iuda, Radix David, Alleluia!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

70 posted on 11/04/2014 8:14:08 AM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: bramps
The disheartening thing here is that he made the comments in the same interview Rush ‘selectively’ chose the comments he quoted (and then you passed on without checking the entire interview).

Oh?

One needs only to find the, uh, 'thing' floating in the punchbowl to dampen one's appetite for anything else on the table.

71 posted on 11/04/2014 10:14:52 AM PST by Elsie ( Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

My message to Republicans:

“Just because you won doesn’t mean we trust you, idiots. The reason why you lost is because liberals couldn’t tell the difference between the fake liberals and the real liberals. Grow a spine this time and by actual conservatives. It worked for Reagan, and more importantly it worked for W when he had the courage to do it.”


72 posted on 11/04/2014 10:20:35 AM PST by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

Here’s the part left out that, at least to me, clearly states that Romney believes that party is against amnesty:

In an interview on “Fox News Sunday,” the former Massachusetts governor said that “This is really the last chance for America to pass judgment on the Obama administration and on its policies. And the president himself said he’s not on the ballot, but his policies are.”

“It’s a policy also of basic amnesty for those people who come to the country illegally. I think that’s what we know where the president is going to head as soon as the election is over,” Romney said.
“The Republican Party is saying, look, we’re going to take a different direction,” Romney continued, saying that a Republican-controlled Senate would “secure the border” and “jump-start the economy.”

Can you now give me the ‘turd in punchbowl’ line that I seem to have missed where he says something that is pro-amnesty?


73 posted on 11/04/2014 12:47:08 PM PST by bramps (Go West America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: bramps

Merely commenting on the ‘selectivity’ that Rush used.

We ALL are ‘selective’ about something; not necessarily about pro-amnesty.


74 posted on 11/04/2014 2:46:43 PM PST by Elsie ( Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: headstamp 2

*groan*


75 posted on 11/10/2014 9:08:51 PM PST by Pining_4_TX (All those who were appointed to eternal life believed. Acts 13:48)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

When people say “I could care less.”, what they mean to say is that they don’t care at all, so the proper expression is “I couldn’t care less.” Saying “I could care less.” means that one does actually care to a certain extent.

Did that answer your question, or did I muddle things more?


76 posted on 11/10/2014 9:26:12 PM PST by Pining_4_TX (All those who were appointed to eternal life believed. Acts 13:48)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Pining_4_TX
When people say “I could care less.”, what they mean to say is that they don’t care at all, so the proper expression is “I couldn’t care less.”

True; this IS how it is mangled MOST of the time; but a person CAN say...

“I could care less.”

and actually MEAN it!


Other than this; you did a fine job explaining the problem: no muddle found in your response at all.



(Watch out; or I'll get that Carry On meme generator thingy going...)

77 posted on 11/11/2014 2:20:57 AM PST by Elsie ( Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson