Posted on 10/30/2014 1:36:09 PM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
AMEN!
Are they (True The Vote) the GOOD guys? Lots of RAT orgs have names that sound like they are freedom inspired, when they’re anything but.
This “Early Lead” is a cheap trick to cover later cheating. The games begin.
This is where CW II will start.
voter fraud is easiest and most common when you vote early. After all one person would have to do a lot of traveling to vote many times in one day.
IOWA has some REALLY STUPID PEOPLE if this is true......Joni Ernst is a TREASURE!!!!!!
No its probable that the cheating itself would be in those early votes.
Most voter fraud is the result of an operation where a handful of people manufacture many votes. You don’t think those votes all are casts on election day do you? No their almost all going to be cast ‘early’ and/or ‘absentee’.
The dead and fictional person after all has a hard time showing up to the poll in person on election day.
Peter Hart polling is DEMOCRAT POLLING!!
Talk to the IDIOTS that will NOT vote for the GOP candidate because they just aren’t Conservative ENOUGH....even though the Democrat is a SOCIALIST or a MARXIST!!! IDIOTS!!
Going to see a bunch of this by liberal pollsters. It’s called vote suppression.
Republicans, Conservatives, Independents, voters of political stripes, etc......turnout, turnout, turnout...and...more turnout....wins elections!!!! Iowa voters...do your thing on election day, vote to tortally destroy the entire Obamabot, Democrat Party, politically in the entire state of IOWA!!!
Good Heavens! No need for anyone to actually show up to vote! And of course, there will be no reliable way to make sure that:
(a) those "early voters" don't also show up registered in another precinct and a ballot being cast there by something or other. And:
(b) O, BTW, just found a batch of these "Early Votes" that somehow fell through the "cracks." Guess we'll have to count them, too. Right?
Democrat fraudsters who submit fraudulent votes in the names of real people try to get the fraudulent votes in early.
That way if the actual person does try to vote they will be turned away because there is already a vote submitted in their name.
The best the real voter can do is submit a provisional vote along with a complaint.
How far is that going to go in a democrat controlled locality?
The way it works is that democrat operatives in local election offices scan the data base for registered voters who have a history of not voting.
Then, in various ways, they submit fraudulent votes for those people.
I know a little bit about this because it happened to my sister-in-law and the scam was explained to me by a republican party official who came to our assistance when the election officials at her polling place turned her away because there had already been a vote cast in her name.
The Two-Party System we have evolved is the worst of all possible worlds because many good people with good conservative common sense (but perhaps not too politically swift,) simply cannot deal with the ambiguity inherent in choosing the Lesser of Two Evils (or weavils). It's not easy. Think of inviting a snake-handling gospel preacher to an Anglican Benediction or Evensong. Would the good Reverend rather go there, or start washing his feet preparatory to entering a mosque to learn how to kill infidels? Not a whole lot of non-violent alternatives because the Anglicans might offer sherry anmd cakes, while the Muslims will be insulted and order your beheading.
Instead of endlessly remonstrating with the sweet and simple SOBs (after all, they are truly standing on their either/or understanding of principle, which makes them harder to deal with), we should point out that their word might carry a bit farther with a RINO lesser-evil wimp like Romney, than with Obama, who obviously considers them scum. (Well, there's at least a chance.)
They’re the good guys. The IRS tried to destroy them. They were on the front lines of exposing the IRS targeting of TEA party groups.
Strange - Fox just did a bit on the race and said that this year, unlike in 2012 when early ballot returns heavily favored ‘rats, early returns were running about even - of course, these are simply the registrations of thsoe returning the ballots, not the actual vote, but Fox seemed to think this pattern favored Republicans based on how early returns usually weight the final vote......
Your one sentence reply is more succinct. My post is from the website of the polling firm — at least they are up front about their alliances.
It’s not enough to win. The Dem needs more like a 20-25 point lead in the early vote to win overall given historical trends.
“The polling data shows Ernst should win. If Braley wins, he cheated.”
democrat, we already know he cheated, if he wins it means he cheated enough.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.