That's actually the dictionary definition of liberal
— you apparently missed the entire point I was making: that 'liberal' and 'conservative' speak different languages. (Given that the hardcore liberals
are the ones in charge of education, do you really think they wouldn't use language/teaching to present their worldview as a good thing? Of course they will!)
Anyone who sees Obamacare, for example, as promoting such values is obviously a total ignoramus! That's why the party of the "liberal" is appropriarely called the Dummycrat Party here.
You're not listening — many of those useful idiots
who were tricked into thinking ObamaCare was some shade of good have had the scales fall from their eyes. Many of the 'liberals' I've met are more liberal because of the public education system [and therefore lack of exposure to differing thoughts] than anything else.
As to the O'Keefe video, it provides enough evidence to show that the 'Rat operatives encouraging a non-citizen to vote are committing a felony under the NC statute.
Oh, yes I know, but that's not what Mr. Finny and I were talking about. What we were talking about was that the majority of America are more conservative than liberal — but there are three big problems (a) out politicians don't pursue conservative values
, (b) a good many people holding rather conservative viewpoints self identify as 'liberal' or otherwise see the world through 'liberal' lenses [because that's the way they've been taught in school], and (c) talking to the people in b to promote the conservative values that they have despite so few conservative candidates.
Where is law enforcement? What are they scared of?
I don't know.
The perps on the video should be arrested and charged forthwith, whether they are male or female, white or black. Just a few well-publicized arrests should go a long way to keeping non-citizens away from the polls and keeping 'Rat hacks from promoting their illegal entrance into the American election system. It's called a deterrent effect.
I don't disagree that the perps should be tried but, again, I was talking w/ Mr Finny about another topic altogether.
So which specific dictionary is that from? You're telling me that, according to that particular dictionary, the definitions of "Liberal" and "conservative" are said to be subjective, depending on who is using the terms.
My take would be that the specific dictionary you cite was a creation of a relatively new politically correct editor and/or publisher, with the objective of getting it approved for use in left-run schools and colleges. I can assure you that dictionary creators of past generations wouldn't have to resort to tables such as that. (BTW, I still use my Funk and Wagnalls from the 1970s and find it perfectly adequate with rare exception.)
So are their several different definitions of what "is" is in your modern-day dictionary, as Clinton stated under oath? :)
Well said!!!!