Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McConnell Concedes GOP Senate Will Not Mean Obamacare Repeal
NPR ^ | October 29, 2014

Posted on 10/29/2014 2:07:38 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer

Election Day isn't until next week, but Senate Majority Leader-in-Waiting Mitch McConnell is already warning Republicans who would like to repeal Obamacare and roll back environmental regulations about two key numbers: 60 and 2.

"It would take 60 votes in the Senate. No one thinks we're going to have 60 Republicans. And it would take a presidential signature. No one thinks we're going to get that," McConnell said during a campaign-stop interview with Fox News.

"This is why nobody believes Mitch McConnell anymore," said Mary Vought, spokeswoman for the Senate Conservatives Fund, a group that has pushed Tea Party candidates in GOP primaries against establishment incumbents. "He says he wants to rip Obamacare out 'root and branch,' but then flips days before his election and says he plans to surrender."

Dan Holler, a spokesman for the political wing of the Heritage Foundation, Heritage Action, said Republicans have to explain to America what they're for. "That is not going to happen if they sit there and make excuses about Harry Reid or Barack Obama. They need to be proactive about putting out an agenda," he said.

McConnell said that with a full Obamacare repeal impossible, he would instead push to repeal the law's tax on medical devices — which a number of Democratic senators already support — and to narrow its mandate on which workers must be covered.

(Excerpt) Read more at npr.org ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: election2014; obamacare; rinocare; senate; uniparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-144 next last
To: Oldeconomybuyer

Mitch is Barry’s bottom b*tch. What a disgusting sight that must be.


21 posted on 10/29/2014 2:16:58 PM PDT by CivilWarBrewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

The party of Romney, Rove, Boehner and McConnell
are nothing but enablers of Obola and Reid
who pull defeat from the jaws of success every two years.


22 posted on 10/29/2014 2:18:04 PM PDT by Diogenesis (The EXEMPT Congress is complicit in the absence of impeachment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Still gotta try mitchey!

KYPD


23 posted on 10/29/2014 2:19:06 PM PDT by petro45acp (Repeal! Recall! Defund! Scrap regulatory agencies!...If it is not the government's job...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark

<>Er, then why should we give control of the Senate to the Republicans?<>

To give 2016 to Jeb.

No thanks.


24 posted on 10/29/2014 2:19:46 PM PDT by Jacquerie (Article V. If not now, when?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Fledermaus

A plan I agree needs to be fully forged however what he stated was 100% factual and a reality for those lacking constitutional knowledge. He can gut it which he put on the table but constitutionally do absolutely do nothing to it with respect to repealing it without the numbers..that’s reality ..the dog already hunted through the courts


25 posted on 10/29/2014 2:19:52 PM PDT by Jarhead9297
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: BitWielder1

I actually saw what he said and he was absolutely correct in stating that Obama wasn’t going to sign a full repeal but they could get some pretty big concessions from the democrats on parts of it.

I don’t love it but Obama will still be president next week and that’s the way it is.


26 posted on 10/29/2014 2:20:23 PM PDT by cripplecreek (You can't half ass conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Mitch is pathetic.

Could be, but what he said should be common knowledge to anyone with a sixth grade education, at least a circa 1955 sixth grade education.

Repeal requires 60 votes, neither side will have that. Repeal requires the President's signature, not going to happen. I don't know where these pipe dreams come from that demand that politicians do something that can't be done. We should insist on actions that can be passed by a Republican Congress that the President will be forced to sign. Those are called Appropriation bills and they should be crafted so that the Democrats can't claim that those evil Republicans shut down the government, took away the National Parks, and starved the poor and the children. That's a tall order to be sure, but a Republican controlled Congress, both in the House and Senate can do much more than the current state of affairs.

27 posted on 10/29/2014 2:22:02 PM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark

I got an e-mail from a friend today warning me that if cochran doesn’t get elected we won’t be able to stop obama’s judical nominees. If memory serves as I recall there are many Republicans lined up to break ranks at the last moment to let obama have his judges approved. Susan Collins, Lindsay Graham, John McCain, they always eem to find however many they need. I do believe cochran will get re-elected but not with my vote and if he doesn’t “what difference does it make”.


28 posted on 10/29/2014 2:22:43 PM PDT by duffee (Dump the Chairman of the Mississippi Republican Party, joe nosef.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MrB; Fledermaus
MrB:
So THEY can control an ever increasingly invasive government. Didn’t you know that?

Oh, yes, yes I did:

IN THE GRIM DARKNESS OF THE FAR FUTURE THERE IS ONLY GOVERNMENT.
[Direct Link]

The Tao of Republican Orthodoxy
[Direct Link]
The Modern Democratic Party & You
[Direct Link]

Fledermaus:
What? You just want Harry Reid to stay in power! /double sarc
That’s the crap you get from “R at all cost” FReepers.

Oh, I dish it right back, pointing out their irrational oblation:

Master Republican guide us. Master Republican teach us. Master Republican protect us. In your light we thrive. In your mercy we are sheltered. In your wisdom we are humbled. We live only to serve. Our lives are yours.

29 posted on 10/29/2014 2:24:53 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

You would think with all those years there would be some wisdom in what to say and when to say it. Mitch truly is the head of the stupid party.


30 posted on 10/29/2014 2:25:41 PM PDT by Fungi (If you do not like my post, don't read it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I would really like to see him lose.


31 posted on 10/29/2014 2:25:42 PM PDT by hsmomx3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Rather than repeal, simply defund. A mandate without appropriations is toothless.


32 posted on 10/29/2014 2:25:42 PM PDT by peyton randolph (Good intentions do not excuse poor results.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer; All
"Mitch is pathetic."
Turtle/"the *itch" McConnell (himself-GOP/E), shoulda retired
12 years ago..now he's a Pathetic/Senile/Elderly Clinger.

and we'll rem: MS.


33 posted on 10/29/2014 2:25:52 PM PDT by skinkinthegrass (Liberalism to Fabianism to Socialism to Marxism to Totalitarianism.. "the inertia of stupidity" d8-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fledermaus

I commiserate with you 100%. Would you rahter elect a thieving corrupt rodent?

I admit the choices are bleak but the only thing we can do is turn the rodents out. The RINOS will see and if they backstab us they do so at their own risk. Two years is time enough to launch an alternative—a national TEA party and vote them in and the RINS out.

Or not.

It is like skydiving, vote Republican and you have a chute on that may or may not open. Vote rodent and you are jumping with no chute on at all.


34 posted on 10/29/2014 2:26:36 PM PDT by the anti-mahdi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Ahh geeze! The fix is in. Mitch won’t fight for ACA repeal but will fight the medical equipment tax provisions so House pet Boehner can keep enjoying cheap tanning beds.


35 posted on 10/29/2014 2:26:36 PM PDT by Covenantor ("Men are ruled...by liars who refuse them news, and by fools who cannot govern." Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
The Republicans have made it very clear that they are only too happy to pass the Obama agenda if they win the Senate. So that will just give the Obama administration BI-PARTISAN COVER for the next two years leading up to the 2016 presidential elections.

Moreover, a Republican Senate victory will prove to the big goverment loving RINOcrats that they don't need the conservative base, on whom they have declared outright WAR, so you can forget about them becoming more conservative anytime soon -- not that we have any more time to wait.

You think it's crazy to say that Republicans intend to pass the Democrat agenda? Consider that:

The Republican leadership is lowering expectations about what they'll do if they take the Senate in 2014.

John McCain is already promising to restore the filibuster and promising to expedite approval of Obama's nominees “I will work very hard to go back to 60 votes,” said Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), who boldly predicts a Republican Senate would process Obama’s nominees “more rapidly than [Democrats] do today.”

And as for the House: John Boehner: ‘Very Few’ Republicans Will Oppose Me

Oh, and best of all, now Republicans are promising that a Senate takeover will increase the odds of passing immigration reform. Republicans: Immigration reform is more likely to happen if we take the Senate

Well at least the Republicans will repeal Obamacare. Oh wait, they won't.

The only SLIM chance we have to save our country at this point is to demonstrate beyond a doubt that the GOPs "moderate" agenda is doomed to fail at the polls.

Only then will we have a chance of having a true conservative Presidential nominee in 2016, and the utter collapse of Democrat credibility after two more years of their control of the Senate.

It is terrible to consider two more years of Democrat Senate Control, but no less terrible to consider the result of GOPe control.

36 posted on 10/29/2014 2:27:33 PM PDT by Maceman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Mitch: See this!

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3221015/posts

Try harder, or step down.


37 posted on 10/29/2014 2:27:51 PM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

It cannot mean repeal unless and until:

There is a veto proof majority.

The Republicans control all the Senate, House, and White House (the ONLY REASON IT PASSED was because Demon Rats held those institutions).

The will of the American people forces Obamugabe’s hand.

The Supreme Court re-visits the subject and changes the game.

People refuse to comply and it dies on its own.

Those are the cold hard facts.


38 posted on 10/29/2014 2:27:58 PM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker
Mitch ought STFU and win his election.

Talk to me Wednesday morning. you hopeless RINO SOB. Is it possible, Please God, that this fat assklown is the Lesser of Two Evils?

39 posted on 10/29/2014 2:28:03 PM PDT by Kenny Bunk (2015-2016. Depending upon what the "Republicans" do, the Republic lives or dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

They don’t need 60 votes, they only need 51, if they repeal if by the same “reconciliation” gambit that was used to pass it in the first place. If someone objects, the response is that if the objection is correct, it was never legally passed in the first place.


40 posted on 10/29/2014 2:28:26 PM PDT by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-144 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson