Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Asserts Fast and Furious Executive Privilege Claim for Holder’s Wife
Judicial Watch ^ | OCTOBER 23, 2014

Posted on 10/23/2014 10:19:50 AM PDT by Red Steel

Judicial Watch announced today that it received from the Obama Department of Justice (DOJ) a “Vaughn index” detailing records about the Operation Fast and Furious scandal. The index was forced out of the Obama administration thanks to JW’s June 2012 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request and subsequent September 2012 FOIA lawsuit (Judicial Watch v. Department of Justice (No. 1:12-cv-01510)). A federal court had ordered the production over the objections of the Obama Justice Department.

The document details the Attorney General Holder’s personal involvement in managing the Justice Department’s strategy on media and Congressional investigations into the Fast and Furious scandal. Notably, the document discloses that emails between Attorney General Holder and his wife Sharon Malone – as well as his mother – are being withheld under an extraordinary claim of executive privilege as well as a dubious claim of deliberative process privilege under the Freedom of Information Act. The “First Lady of the Justice Department” is a physician and not a government employee.

This is the first time that the Obama administration has provided a detailed listing of all records being withheld from Congress and the American people about the deadly Fast and Furious gun running scandal. The 1307-page “draft” Vaughn index was emailed to Judicial Watch at 8:34 p.m. last night, a few hours before a federal court-ordered deadline. In its cover letter, the Department of Justice asserts that all of the responsive records described in the index are “subject to the assertion of executive privilege.”

The Vaughn index explains 15,662 documents. Typically, a Vaughn index must: (1) identify each record withheld; (2) state the statutory exemption claimed; and (3) explain how disclosure would damage the interests protected by the claimed exemption. The Vaughn index arguably fails to provide all of this required information but does provide plenty of interesting information for a public kept in the dark for years about the Fast and Furious scandal.

Based on a preliminary review of the massive document, Judicial Watch can disclose that the Vaughn index reveals:

- Numerous emails that detail Attorney General Holder’s direct involvement in crafting talking points, the timing of public disclosures, and handling Congressional inquiries in the Fast and Furious matter.

- President Obama has asserted executive privilege over nearly 20 email communications between Holder and his spouse Sharon Malone. The administration also claims that the records are also subject to withholding under the “deliberative process” exemption. This exemption ordinarily exempts from public disclosure records that could chill internal government deliberations.

- Numerous entries detail DOJ’s communications (including those of Eric Holder) concerning the White House about Fast and Furious.

- The scandal required the attention of virtually every top official of the DOJ and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF). Communications to and from the United States Ambassador to Mexico about the Fast and Furious matter are also described.

- Many of the records are already publicly available such as letters from Congress, press clips, and typical agency communications. Ordinarily, these records would, in whole or part, be subject to disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act. Few of the records seem to even implicate presidential decision-making and advice that might be subject to President Obama’s broad and unprecedented executive privilege claim.

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton criticized President Obama and his disgraced Attorney General in a statement today:

This document provides key information about the cover-up of Fast and Furious by Attorney General Eric Holder and other high-level officials of the Obama administration. Obama’s executive privilege claims over these records are a fraud and an abuse of his office. There is no precedent for President Obama’s Nixonian assertion of executive privilege over these ordinary government agency records. Americans will be astonished that Obama asserted executive privilege over Eric Holder’s emails to his wife about Fast and Furious.

Once again, Judicial Watch has proven itself more effective than Congress and the establishment media in providing basic oversight of this out-of-control Administration. This Fast and Furious document provides dozens of leads for further congressional, media, and even criminal investigations.

On June 28, 2012, Attorney General Eric Holder was held in contempt by the House of Representatives over his refusal to turn over records explaining why the Obama administration may have lied to Congress and refused for months to disclose the truth about the gun running operation. It marked the first time in U.S. history that a sitting Attorney General was held in contempt of Congress.

A week before the contempt finding, to protect Holder from criminal prosecution and stave off the contempt vote, President Obama asserted executive privilege over the Fast and Furious records the House Oversight Committee had subpoenaed eight months earlier. Judicial Watch filed its FOIA request two days later. Holder’s Justice Department wouldn’t budge (or follow the law), so JW filed a FOIA lawsuit on September 12, 2012.

But then the Justice Department convinced U.S. District Court Judge John D. Bates to stay our lawsuit, in part to allow ongoing settlement discussions between the Holder’s government lawyers and the House Committee to continue. Unsurprisingly, the “negotiations” between politicians running the House and the Justice Department went nowhere.

Fed up with the interminable delay caused Holder’s gamesmanship and stonewalling, JW renewed its request to the Court to allow our transparency lawsuit to continue. Thankfully, this past July, Judge John D. Bates ended the 16-month delay and ordered the Obama administration to produce a Vaughn index of the alleged “executive privilege” records by October 1. Judge Bates noted that no court has ever “expressly recognized” President Obama’s unprecedented executive privilege claims in the Fast and Furious matter.

Unhappy with having to produce the records prior to the elections, Justice lawyers asked the judge to give them one extra month, until November 3 (the day before Election Day!) to produce the info. Judge Bates rejected this gambit, suggested that the Holder’s agency did not take court order seriously. Rather than a month, Judge Bates gave Justice until yesterday to cough up the Vaughn index. Judge Bates issued his smack down on September 23.

Attorney General Eric Holder announced his resignation two days later.

Many share our opinion it was “no coincidence” that Holder’s resignation came “on the heels of another court ruling that the Justice Department must finally cough up information about how Holder’s Justice Department lied to Congress and the American people about the Operation Fast and Furious scandal, for which Eric Holder was held in contempt by the House of Representatives.”

The House had been separately litigating to obtain the records but had gotten nowhere until after Judge Bates ruled that the DOJ finally had to disclose information to Judicial Watch.

On September 9, U.S. District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson, citing Judicial Watch’s success, ordered the Justice Department to produce information to Congress by November 3.

Fast and Furious was a DOJ/Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) “gun running” operation in which the Obama administration reportedly allowed guns to go to Mexican drug cartels hoping they would end up at crime scenes, advancing gun-control policies. Fast and Furious weapons have been implicated in the murder of Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry and hundreds of other innocents in Mexico. Guns from the Fast and Furious scandal are expected to be used in criminal activity on both sides of the U.S.-Mexico border for years to come.

Guns from the Fast and Furious scandal continue to be used in crimes. Just last week, Judicial Watch disclosed that a Fast and Furious gun was used in gang -style assault on a Phoenix apartment building that left two people wounded. We figured this out from information we uncovered through another public records lawsuit against the City of Phoenix.

Congress officially confirmed the AK-47 was used in the assault that terrorized residents in Phoenix. In an October 16 letter sent from Sen. Charles Grassley (R-IA) and Rep. Darryl Issa (R-CA) to Deputy Attorney General James Cole discloses that “we have learned of another crime gun connected to Fast and Furious. The [Justice] Department did not provide any notice to the Congress or the public about this gun….This lack of transparency about the consequences of Fast and Furious undermines public confidence in law enforcement and gives the impression that the Department is seeking to suppress information and limit its exposure to public scrutiny.”

We have many other active lawsuits over the Fast and Furious scandal:

On October 11, 2011, Judicial Watch sued the DOJ and the ATF to obtain all Fast and Furious records submitted to the House Committee on Oversight.

On June 6, 2012, Judicial Watch sued the ATF seeking access to records detailing communications between ATF officials and Kevin O’Reilly, former Obama White House Director of North American Affairs at the U.S. National Security Council.

On September 5, 2013, Judicial Watch sued the DOJ seeking access to all records of communications between DOJ and the Oversight Committee relating to settlement discussions in the Committee’s 2012 contempt of Congress lawsuit against Holder. The contempt citation stemmed from Holder’s refusal to turn over documents to Congress related to the Fast and Furious gunrunning scandal.

On May 28, 2014, Judicial Watch sued the DOJ on behalf of ATF Special Agent John Dodson, who blew the whistle on Operation Fast and Furious and was then subjected to an alleged smear campaign designed to destroy his reputation.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News
KEYWORDS: 2deadfeds; 300deadmexicans; atf; banglist; brianterry; cia; dea; dhs; doj; ericholder; fastandfurious; fastfurious; fbi; gunrunner; gunwalker; holder; ice; jaimezapata; judicialwatch; jw; obama; terry; vaughnindex; zapata
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: Red Steel

Judge Bates backed them into a corner and 0bama’s farcical executive privilege is far worse than imagined.


21 posted on 10/23/2014 10:51:35 AM PDT by jazusamo (0bama to go 'full-Mussolini' after elections: Mark Levin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Ok, if this isn’t, “High Crimes and misdemeanors,” what is?

5.56mm


22 posted on 10/23/2014 10:52:43 AM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

No wonder this rat, Holder, can’t jump ship fast enough.

CGato


23 posted on 10/23/2014 10:54:20 AM PDT by Conservative Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowacornman

if the judge does not quietly go away........


24 posted on 10/23/2014 10:58:15 AM PDT by cableguymn (We need a redneck in the white house....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Thanks for the update. I am not surprised by any of this. Just running out the clock until they are all “gone”. lots of Pardons will be issued before OB is gone.
Does this mean Holder, his wife & Mother were sharing classified information? If not classified, do they work for any of these Agencies? Me thinks this would fall under the Espionage ACT and/or RICO(at the least). Conspiracy to Murder(Terry & Zapata) come to mind.


25 posted on 10/23/2014 10:58:57 AM PDT by DrDude (Does anyone have a set of balls anymore?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

If Mrs. Holder is a Red Blooded American, she needs to divorce her husband and testify against him.

She would be lauded as a hero! Government buildings would be named in her honor! Schoolchildren would be chanting, “Sharon Malone Holder...Mmm....Mmm....Mmm!!”

Yeah. That’ll happen. She’ll do that. *SMIRK*


26 posted on 10/23/2014 10:59:48 AM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robert14; iowacornman

The judge has to pick up the pace.


27 posted on 10/23/2014 11:01:45 AM PDT by Ray76 (We must destroy the Uniparty or be destroyed by them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

This is as bad as Bill Clinton’s attempts to delay being sued by Paula Jones for sexual harassment, claiming that because he is Commander-in-Chief, he should therefore be considered on active-duty, and granted immunity.


28 posted on 10/23/2014 11:04:29 AM PDT by mass55th (Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway...John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Obama knows he’ll be golfing on Oahu by the time this gets to SCOTUS.


29 posted on 10/23/2014 11:20:13 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Yep...


30 posted on 10/23/2014 11:21:43 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Dunam, Duncan, man what infections these folks brought over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: SMARTY

Too Bad Ben Bradley died, he would have gotten to the bottom of this scandal. Opps, it has to do with a Democrat Scandal.... belay that last comment.
Maybe Woodward and Bernstein would expose it .... Opps, it has to do with a Democrat Scandal.... belay that last comment.


31 posted on 10/23/2014 11:24:28 AM PDT by BilLies ( it isn't the color of the skin, but the culture embraced that degrades.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

The EXEMPT US Congress remains INFERIOR to the spouse
of an appointed criminal during his murder of LEO.


32 posted on 10/23/2014 11:29:26 AM PDT by Diogenesis (The EXEMPT Congress is complicit in the absence of impeachment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

“On September 5, 2013, Judicial Watch sued the DOJ seeking access to all records of communications between DOJ and the Oversight Committee relating to settlement discussions in the Committee’s 2012 contempt of Congress lawsuit against Holder.”

Why would not JW also sue the Oversight Committee for the records of the communications?


33 posted on 10/23/2014 11:31:17 AM PDT by VMI70
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

He’ll try any stalling technique he can so it doesn’t hit before the election.


34 posted on 10/23/2014 11:59:02 AM PDT by Cubs Fan (The ferguson rioters, looters and arsonists are DOMESTIC LEFT WING TERRORISTS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

He may feel he HAS to cancel elections and declare martial law, just to prevent all the criminal prosecutions


35 posted on 10/23/2014 12:11:41 PM PDT by faithhopecharity ((Brilliant, Profound Tag Line Goes Here, just as soon as I can think of one..) uit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: faithhopecharity

Criminals surrounded by criminals and criminal families. That is the Clown Prince nobola “administration”. I’d go so far as to include most of the subhuman debris doing “public service” in WDC.


36 posted on 10/23/2014 12:23:30 PM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: VMI70
Why would not JW also sue the Oversight Committee for the records of the communications?

I believe that under FOIA only the originating agency can release documents. If the IRS had documents from DOJ they would not have to (or for that matter be able to) release them.

37 posted on 10/23/2014 12:25:42 PM PDT by usurper (Liberals GET OFF MY LAWN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: robert14
Now that we know what documents exist how and when does JW obtain the actual documents?


And that's a long, long time.

38 posted on 10/23/2014 12:38:10 PM PDT by Bratch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Obama’s presidential pardon list is going to rival the Manhattan phone directory in size. Or. maybe not. The narcissist in chief may just say GTH and send them all off to the Graybar Hotel.


39 posted on 10/23/2014 1:40:41 PM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

What a FREAKING JOKE!!! If this were a Republican....OMG!!!


40 posted on 10/23/2014 1:45:40 PM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion.....the Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson