If that were the reason, I presume those that brought the lawsuit could have shown ONE person, at least, whom was effected by the Law (IE: disenfranchised)???
Even if they could, the 1st cross-question should be something along the lines of “Since the IDs are given out FREE, to those that need, what prevents you from obtaining ID?”, or, even better yet, “Do you currently collect taxpayer funded welfare in any shape, matter or form?” (gotta have an ID there)
Funny how one govt program is required to have ID in one circumstance ...but not in the other....where one is far more important in overall security of the nation...if we have learned nothing over the last 6 yrs is how backward and right down embarrassing democrats are...
Alan Keyes was personally effected, but no judge would touch it, none ever will.