Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lower oil prices are unambiguously good
Human Events.com ^ | October 18, 2014 | Larry Kudlow

Posted on 10/17/2014 9:03:36 PM PDT by Abakumov

Steep stock market corrections often create shrouds of pessimism that do bad things to people’s brainpower. And one of the absolutely stupidest things I have heard in recent weeks is that the recent drop in oil prices is bad.

You heard me right. Serious people on financial television are saying lower oil prices are a signal of worldwide economic collapse. Here at home that translates to recession, deflation, a profits collapse and rising unemployment.

I’ve been around for a while, and I’ve seldom heard such gibberish.

The latest stock market scare stems from a bunch of fears — such as the possible spread of Ebola, economic slowdowns in Europe and Asia, and deflation worries. And when the stock market decides to correct, any reason will do. We must respect the wisdom of the market.

But the recent $20 drop in crude oil is an unambiguous good thing for the American and world economies. Unambiguous.

(Excerpt) Read more at humanevents.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Russia
KEYWORDS: collapse; doom; doomandgloom; doomsday; economy; energy; fracking; gibberish; keystone; larrykudlow; nuttery; oil; opec; recovery; russia; saudiarabia; vladtheimploder
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: Abakumov

Venezuela is blaming the U.S. for low oil prices. They can blame Obama, Gore, the U.N. and all the save the earth nuts with their windmills, solar panels, electric cars,


21 posted on 10/18/2014 12:34:06 AM PDT by YukonGreen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abakumov

Yeah - higher energy costs are always a good sign, while cheap and plentiful energy will crush us .....


22 posted on 10/18/2014 4:17:05 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abakumov

The danger is not cheap oil, but the consequences of general commodity price collapses.

Many investors and businesses would be destroyed in a “general commodities price collapse”.

That could happen. BUT, with a good outcome in the November elections this could return confidence to the US in the world’s eyes.

A global financial collapse is possible. NO, I am not a conspiracy buff. But there are forces of evil in the US and abroad that would love to see the US destroyed.

Imagine the Global Chaos from that.


23 posted on 10/18/2014 5:08:53 AM PDT by Texas Fossil (Texas is not where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind & Attitude!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abakumov

Coke head Kudlow. Ive been in the biz a long time too, over 30 years. Sure lower prices have benefits but its also a supply and demand story and demand drives prices so the lower prices are telling us something.
To really know the effect i’d lke to know a few things like what percentage of fuel oil consumption is being replaced by renewables. Another that won’t be known for awhile is how much are airlines (and other transportation industries ) are locking in for future consumption. They know how many seats they normally have booked one two or more months in advance. Its part of the equation they use to determine how much to buy in advance. What are they doing? What are they seeing?
He can spout off like most other guests without a clue on CNBC. They constantly bring back people with losing records because in the end its about entertainment and not substance. They merely add a veneer of credibility to what are often baseless speculations.


24 posted on 10/18/2014 5:27:04 AM PDT by wiggen (The teacher card. When the racism card just won't work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

You sir win the prize. And for the posters here who think he’s shilling for Obama he’s knocked him many times in the past. He’s simply going with his natural everything is bullish inclination which is sometimes correct and often times wrong.


25 posted on 10/18/2014 5:29:39 AM PDT by wiggen (The teacher card. When the racism card just won't work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: boycott
Increased supply has to do with fracking.

On the flip side, as fracking increases supply and the price of oil decreases, fracking as a means of production becomes less cost effective.

I don't know where the bottom is, but I don't think we'll see $2/gal gas again.

26 posted on 10/18/2014 5:57:21 AM PDT by St_Thomas_Aquinas ( Isaiah 22:22, Matthew 16:19, Revelation 3:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
The Saudis would rather take a short term hit to bankrupt those invested in American oil rather than watch their market share dissipate.

It's more likely they are doing it at our behest to help Obama, hurt Russia, and bury other small fry like Venezuela and even ISIS.

For Obama, any harm to fracking would be just an incidental plus.

27 posted on 10/18/2014 6:05:32 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ([CTRL-GALT-DELETE])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
If Saudi Arabia intends to drive out western oil producers and maintain their monopoly, is that long term good for the economy? Do we really like being depend on SaudiArabia? In the US today the pockets of economic strength are in areas where there is drilling. How does an end to that help long term?

I wonder how the whole thing plays out.

28 posted on 10/18/2014 6:05:36 AM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

Drilling/Fraking is very sensitive to prevailing energy prices. My company makes equipment for the oil patch. Orders get cancelled when oil prices drop $5. It seems ridiculous, but the oil business is very aware of alternative energy sources.


29 posted on 10/18/2014 6:06:49 AM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Abakumov

No, the collapse world in oil price is the sign of Texas Eagle Ford producing 1.2 million barrels a day of “light sweet” crude.


30 posted on 10/18/2014 6:17:41 AM PDT by norwaypinesavage (The Stone Age did not end because we ran out of stones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grania

” Do we really like being depend on SaudiArabia?”

Absolutely not. I contend oil spiking to $150 a barrel is what sent the whole house of cards tumbling before the financial crisis.


31 posted on 10/18/2014 6:28:25 AM PDT by Lurkina.n.Learnin (It's a shame nobama truly doesn't care about any of this. Our country, our future, he doesn't care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Abakumov

Incumbents benefit from cheaper fuel prices. In the two months before the 2012 general election, fuel prices dropped 9% (37 cents) with OHIO (key battleground state between Romney/Obama) dropping 55 cents. Low fuel prices boost consumer confidence. Obama was re-elected. We all know (or should) that it is the Wall Street speculators who control the price of oil (not demand) but we also know that Wall Street gives more to Dems than Repubs. Quoting Jim Demint of the Heritage Foundation “...it amazed me while I was in Congress to see the big Wall Street banks, the big corporations — they give more to Democrats, many times more, than they do to Republicans because the big government, and the more it grows, the more it advantages them.”

These low prices are a temporary gift to the incumbent Dems for Wall Street’s future advantage. Wink wink. Bought and paid for. Simple.


32 posted on 10/18/2014 7:48:38 AM PDT by johnsmom (I must be dreaming 'cause this can't be real)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kennard

Just part of my background, in a way. Made sense at the time.


33 posted on 10/18/2014 9:08:01 AM PDT by Abakumov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
oil price drop is a boon to the workers and middle class types....

and its a bust for the oil producers...

34 posted on 10/18/2014 10:28:59 AM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Abakumov
its all good for we the middle class......we're wasting less at the pump and since the price of food, etc is affected by transportation cost, their cost should be reduced as well.....

I could care less if the big elites get a little less profit....

I agree with whoever said this could just be a Middle east scheme to slow the production and exploration of oil/gas here in North America.....

which all means in the end is that we're just little puppets on a string in this world, swaying whichever way the elites want us to go...

35 posted on 10/18/2014 10:34:17 AM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Abakumov

I think it’s a sign of an election. The price will go back up afterwards.


36 posted on 10/18/2014 12:16:39 PM PDT by virgil (The evil that men do lives after them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liberty Valance

By order of the Prophets......


37 posted on 10/18/2014 1:04:56 PM PDT by Shady (We are at war again......this time for our lives...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: grania

Rest assured, there is no way your scenario will play out.

To begin with, the western oil would still be there. If Saudi Arabia, or OPEC, or any other oil producer raised the economic or political price domestic suppliers would step back in.

The OPEC nations can’t just turn off the tap — nor can they flood the market with oil. They’re way too dependent on oil revenues to do either. They also pump more oil, when there’s a supply glut — that just drives prices even lower. They can’t cut production during low prices, because they need the revenue (or face revolutions).

New investment in oil sands or shale will no doubt fall off, as prices drop. However, once a well (or open-pit mine) is developed (sunk cost — literally), it faces a lower marginal operational cost. Prices would have to drop to under $35.00/bbl before most oil sands production would be uneconomic.

BTW, for years now, Canada (already your biggest supplier) has been ready to sell the U.S. a lot more oil — more than you now import from Saudi Arabia, Iraq, and Kuwait combined. All that’s required is U.S. approval for the pipeline.


38 posted on 10/18/2014 3:28:45 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Abakumov; SunkenCiv; entropy12; USFRIENDINVICTORIA; boycott; chiller; Kennard; Liberty Valance; ...

Low Oil Prices: A $660 Billion Stimulus Package
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3216278/posts


39 posted on 10/21/2014 12:06:38 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (The question isn't who is going to let me; it's who is going to stop me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

i don’t agree lower oil is an unambiguous good. No doubt it has benefits but it’s also signaling underlying weakness in world economies. It might be seen as feeling really good but having a serious illness at the same time.


40 posted on 10/21/2014 12:45:18 AM PDT by wiggen (The teacher card. When the racism card just won't work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson