To: SeekAndFind
Why? They didn’t contact her bodily fluids, and she didn’t have a fever when on the flight, so why should the other passengers be monitored?
6 posted on
10/15/2014 9:18:18 AM PDT by
txrefugee
To: txrefugee
Why? They didn’t contact her bodily fluids, and she didn’t have a fever when on the flight, so why should the other passengers be monitored? If nothing else, one could theoretically come into contact with bodily fluids in the bathroom on the plane. Although I would think the risk from a woman would be quite a bit lower lower that from a man. And there's also the possibility of aerosolized coughing, sneezing, etc.
24 posted on
10/15/2014 9:27:29 AM PDT by
Menehune56
("Let them hate so long as they fear" (Oderint Dum Metuant), Lucius Accius (170 BC - 86 BC))
To: txrefugee
Why? They didn’t contact her bodily fluids, and she didn’t have a fever when on the flight, so why should the other passengers be monitored?
"Kids, today's word is HYPOCRISY."
50 posted on
10/15/2014 9:37:57 AM PDT by
Yaelle
To: txrefugee
You’re contagious at least a few days before symptoms present in this variant from other reports.
58 posted on
10/15/2014 9:41:41 AM PDT by
Axenolith
(Government blows, and that which governs least, blows least...)
To: txrefugee
It’s airborne, they are parsing words.
A doctor said a few days ago that it resides in the droplets produced by coughing or sneezing.
119 posted on
10/15/2014 10:56:58 AM PDT by
COUNTrecount
(There's no there there.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
