Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anti-GOP Ad on Ebola: 'Republican Cuts Kill' (Stinks like Desparation
Townhall.com ^ | October 13, 2014 | Guy Benson

Posted on 10/13/2014 2:40:40 PM PDT by Kaslin

Arkansas Democrat Mark Pryor raised eyebrows and invited scorn in August when he released a television ad tying his Republican opponent to the Ebola crisis. Although the spot was roundly mocked as hyperbolic and flailing, a Democratic group has decided to take Pryor's concept several steps further with a new commercial called 'Republican cuts kill.' It features, well, actual footage of Africans dying of Ebola. Just watch:

Republican Cuts Kill

Somewhere, MSNBC's Joy Reid is wondering why she didn't think of this attack first. Rebutting the new ad may not be worth my time, but it fails on several levels.  First, it grossly violates the 'ick' test.  Many Americans have concerns about the government's competence to contain Ebola cases inside the United States; very few will squarely, or even glancingly, blame a political party's ideology for the current scare. On a related note, there is zero nuance in this ad. It ponderously draws a straight line from Republicans' desire to rein in federal spending to people dying of Ebola.  That linkage is so ridiculous on its face that I can't even summon any real indignation over it.  Second, in spite of CDC and NIH officials' complaints, Jim Geraghty notes that the latter group's budget has doubled since 2000 , and Gov. Bobby Jindal questions the CDC's spending priorities:

In recent years, the CDC has received significant amounts of funding. Unfortunately, however, many of those funds have been diverted away from programs that can fight infectious diseases, and toward programs far afield from the CDC’s original purpose. Consider the Prevention and Public Health Fund, a new series of annual mandatory appropriations created by Obamacare. Over the past five years, the CDC has received just under $3 billion in transfers from the fund. Yet only 6 percent—$180 million—of that $3 billion went toward building epidemiology and laboratory capacity. Especially given the agency’s postwar roots as the Communicable Disease Center, one would think that “detecting and responding to infectious diseases and other public health threats” warrants a larger funding commitment. Instead, the Obama administration has focused the CDC on other priorities. While protecting Americans from infectious diseases received only $180 million from the Prevention Fund, the community transformation grant program received nearly three times as much money—$517.3 million over the same five-year period.

The Left attempted a similar diversion during the VA scandal. So...yeah, basically:

Government incompetence is always the Republicans’ fault because they refused to fund more government incompetence.— John Ekdahl (@JohnEkdahl) October 13, 2014


The only way to fix wildly expensive government failures is to suck even more money out of the economy and hand it over to the government. Another important reality check:  Republican budget "cuts" simply slow down the overall rate of spending increases.  Even the dreaded sequester -- which was President Obama's idea, changes to which he vowed to veto -- barely dented spending at all. Reason's Nick Gillespie has an excellent post full of facts and charts to refute the DEADLY CUTS! hyperventilating. To put things in perspective, President Clinton's last budget (FY 2000) called for $1.77 trillion in federal spending.  A decade-and-a-half later, we're steadily marching toward $4 trillion in outlays, having accrued well over $17 trillion in debt, with tens of trillions more looming in unpaid-for promises.  The notion that the federal government is spending every single one of those dollars responsibly is laughable. The federal budget is rife with waste, inefficiencies and reckless long-term math. John Hayward's apt summary:  "We don't have an under-funded government.  We have a bad government."  Republicans are right to fight for needed reforms and restraint -- and doing so does not entail far-fetched side effects such as aiding and abetting Ebola.  And by the way, if that insane Ebola ad reminds you of this startling smear of Paul Ryan in 2011, it might be because both spots were produced by the same group.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: budgetcuts; demagoguery; ebola
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

1 posted on 10/13/2014 2:40:40 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The Democrat desperation machine shifts into high gear.


2 posted on 10/13/2014 2:43:47 PM PDT by Sasparilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Somewhere, MSNBC's Joy Reid is wondering why she didn't think of this attack first

ABC Radio News beat her to it.

3 posted on 10/13/2014 2:45:43 PM PDT by Inyo-Mono (NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The GOPe invites this kind of attack. They believe they have the election in the bag and only have to keep their mouths shut to clinch it. Their record of cowardice and lack of principles certainly does not discourage their critics.


4 posted on 10/13/2014 2:49:56 PM PDT by trubolotta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Republicans never, by any objective standard, EVER cut the funding to CDC. The bureaucracy at CDC simply allocated the generously available funds poorly and with emphasis on entirely the wrong objectives.

In fact, poor allocation of resources is one of the major problems now vexing the territory once known as “the United States of America”.

Misspending our bounty is probably one of the lesser infractions of the Current Regime. Finding entirely new and ever more foolish ways to direct that time and treasure is surely the greater criminality in the order of things.

If it ain’t broke, why spend so much time and money “fixing” it?


5 posted on 10/13/2014 2:50:29 PM PDT by alloysteel (Most people become who they promised they would never be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Yes, but the FACTS shout out that it is the Dems and their unlimited immigration policies that actually bring in these diseases...

...and having a pResident named “Obola” - err, um, ugh, Ebama - oh, um, schitt - Obama is just purrrfect for the Republicans.

Obala, it ain’t just for Africa any more.


6 posted on 10/13/2014 2:50:44 PM PDT by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I'm sorry, but this disgusting approach by the democrats is not funny in the least, and despite the atrociousness of it, has the capacity to influence a significant percentage of those who vote. If Republicans and conservatives don't respond to these types of disgusting approaches by Democrats, they are failing all of us. This needs to be destroyed at its roots. No political party in American history has politicized medicine and science more than the current group of Democrats. This has to be fought with a very aggressive response.
7 posted on 10/13/2014 2:51:00 PM PDT by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Obama is the one who proposed cutting the CDC

I don’t think the Republicans control the Senate

So I am not sure how anyone could logically blame this on the GOP


8 posted on 10/13/2014 2:58:54 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Yet only 6 percent—$180 million—of that $3 billion went toward building epidemiology and laboratory capacity

See: White House

9 posted on 10/13/2014 2:59:29 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trubolotta
You are not any help by encouraging our side to stay home.

Don't deny it because that is exactly what you are trying to do

10 posted on 10/13/2014 3:01:31 PM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

So the pigs are blaming the GOP for leaving the gate open when the pig in chief is the one at fault? Full throttle loathing here.


11 posted on 10/13/2014 3:08:23 PM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
That is correct we do not control the Senate. Dingy Harry is sitting on over 500 bill that the House send over to the senate, but he refuses to send them on the floor to be voted on.

Someone needs to tell that arrogant pos occupant of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave that Congress consists of two Houses: The Senate and the House of Representatives. Just because the reps are addressed as Congressmen, doesn't make them the entire congress

12 posted on 10/13/2014 3:10:41 PM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I am merely pointing out a fact that the Republican leadership is incompetent, unprincipled and cowardly and therefore invites these types of attacks. The sooner we dispose of them, the better.

I don’t deny my disgust for the GOPe one bit. The sooner we are rid of them and have principled and inspired leadership, the sooner we can save this republic, if it is not too late.


13 posted on 10/13/2014 3:11:38 PM PDT by trubolotta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
In the high-schoolish world of American politics, Democrats are mean spirited bullies and republicans are the dorky science nerds. The nerds have carefully analyzed the situation and determined that the cheerleader (voters) will surely run to date them as soon as they see just how mean and cruel that rotten motorycle riding, leather jacket wearing, pot smoking bully is. No need to woo her, it's the only logical choice.

You know how the rest goes.

14 posted on 10/13/2014 3:15:54 PM PDT by pepsi_junkie (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

This is what the repo we needs to be:

Flashback: “CDC preparedness funds take hit in proposed 2014 [OBAMA] budget”

Apr 10, 2013 (CIDRAP News) – The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) takes a hit of about $270 million in the Obama administration’s proposed fiscal year 2014 budget, including significant cuts to biodefense and emergency preparedness programs, officials revealed today.

CDC Director Tom Frieden, MD, speaking at a Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) press conference, said the “overall program budget would come down by about $270 million” under the budget proposal, compared with spending in fiscal year 2012...

http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2013/04/cdc-preparedness-funds-take-hit-proposed-2014-budget


15 posted on 10/13/2014 3:16:17 PM PDT by Bulwinkle (Alec, a.k.a. Daffy Duck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

And why aren`t the Retardicans hitting back with: Obola and his DemocRats care more about the economy of West Africa and political correctness than about American lives.


16 posted on 10/13/2014 3:18:51 PM PDT by nomad (Lorenzo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bulwinkle

Flashback: The money that could have been used went to Solyndra to develop ebola resistant solar panels and bail out Obama’s donors.


17 posted on 10/13/2014 3:19:24 PM PDT by trubolotta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

You can thank Erica Whatsherface of the Agenda Project for it.

As subtle as a flying mallet.


18 posted on 10/13/2014 3:26:00 PM PDT by sauropod (Fat Bottomed Girl: "What difference, at this point, does it make?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bulwinkle
No, just do an ad where Obola and his cronies own recorded words are played verbatim while a critical couple of people are talking over the Bozos.

Commenters: "Is this double talk for real?" (other voice cuts in) "You mean their economy is more important to them than our lives!" (different voice) "Sure as hell sounds like it!" (first voice) "What the (bleep) is wrong with these Bozos!" (new voice) "You tell me!" (final voice) NO! With that attitude, you tell me why they should be in charge!" then a fade out as you hear "American lives should come first to American leaders..."

19 posted on 10/13/2014 3:33:08 PM PDT by nomad (Lorenzo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: trubolotta

On that I agree. This stuff needs to be responded to in kind. If they don’t, the big lie will stick, like the fake War on Women.


20 posted on 10/13/2014 3:34:01 PM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson