Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Claud
This IS the hill to die on. Baking a cake for this Sodomitic debauch is at very least the sin of scandal.

I'll demonstrate your absurdity here...and that point above is absurdity. Your clever use of sodomy to over compensate is really interesting, but I'll leave that one alone.

By your ridiculous standards, baking for non virgins, for cheaters, for folks who are living together before marrying, for daughters of unscrupulous businessmen, etc.....is just as much of a scandal. The Bible does not grade sin on a curve. This baker sins. Every customer he or she has ever had sins. Period.

94 posted on 09/30/2014 8:24:54 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (www.FireKarlRove.com NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]


To: C. Edmund Wright
By your ridiculous standards, baking for non virgins, for cheaters, for folks who are living together before marrying, for daughters of unscrupulous businessmen, etc.....is just as much of a scandal.

No. You can bake a cake for two fornicators that has nothing to with their fornication, or two unscrupulous businessmen that has nothing to with their theft. Because THOSE cakes are not honoring the SIN, they are honoring something else.

The equivalent here is if people came to you and said "bake me a fornication cake", or a "cheater cake", or a "fraud cake".

And why are you mocking the reference to sodomy? What the heck else is a "gay wedding" celebrating ?

98 posted on 09/30/2014 8:38:53 AM PDT by Claud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson