Skip to comments.
Islamic State fight could breathe new life into the A-10
Stars and Stripes ^
| September 26, 2014
| Jennifer H. Svan
Posted on 09/27/2014 12:18:20 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet
21
posted on
09/27/2014 1:07:15 PM PDT
by
JPG
("So sue me". OK, we will.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
That stuff gives me a Hog-on.
22
posted on
09/27/2014 1:12:01 PM PDT
by
clbiel
(Islamophobia: The irrational fear of being decapitated)
To: MattinNJ
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Designed to shoot Soviet tanks rolling across the open fields of Europe,Could still happen.
24
posted on
09/27/2014 1:15:54 PM PDT
by
McGruff
(we're leaving behind a sovereign, stable and self-reliant Iraq - Barack Obama)
To: elcid1970
Napalm means “marshmallow time”.
25
posted on
09/27/2014 1:17:22 PM PDT
by
Darksheare
(People who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
To: BwanaNdege
The unverfiable doesn’t want anything killing his bros cuz they have a Country to conquer. The fact that he knows our secrets kind of dooms us. However I’m still for doing to them what the A-10 does best.
26
posted on
09/27/2014 1:22:44 PM PDT
by
mcshot
(Kenya now says 0 or Soebarkah born in U.S..)
To: drunknsage
In the armor museum at Fort Irwin California, the National Training Center, are several former Iraqi/Warsaw Pact tanks that had been lit up by the Warthog.
I could almost put my hand through the holes they left in the top of the turret and we are talking about three inches of steel cut through like hot knife through butter.
27
posted on
09/27/2014 1:32:03 PM PDT
by
Molon Labbie
(Prep. Now. Live Healthy, take your Shooting Iron daily.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
The same thing which makes the A-10 so effective, low and slow, also makes it vulnerable.
It has gotten to where it is too vulnerable.
28
posted on
09/27/2014 1:43:17 PM PDT
by
yarddog
(G)
To: clbiel
LOL!!! I’ll bet the pilots get the same when they roll in on some terrorist trucks and get to do a little muzzy ‘plinkin’ with that gun!! BBBBBZZZZZZTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT!!!
29
posted on
09/27/2014 1:56:38 PM PDT
by
bobby.223
(Retired up in the snowy mountains of the American Redoubt and It's a GREAT life!)
To: Dedbone
If not, I’m sure the Marines can find a place for them. They’ll gladly pay $1 per aircraft.
30
posted on
09/27/2014 2:02:31 PM PDT
by
NTHockey
(Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners. And to the NSA trolls, FU)
To: SeeSharp
No, it is the Air Force that didn't want the planes to begin with because it is not an Air Force plane. It is an Army plane best flown by Army pilots for ground support. The problem lies when you give the Air Force the authority to purchase all aircraft (just as it is when you let the Navy purchase all Marine Corps equipment).
Budget cuts for the A-10 did not occur until four years AFTER Dick Cheney left office. So to blame Dick Cheney for ordering them destroyed is simply not valid.
31
posted on
09/27/2014 2:24:44 PM PDT
by
Hoodat
(Article 4, Section 4)
To: NTHockey
That would be $1 the Navy would not be willing to spend.
32
posted on
09/27/2014 2:25:43 PM PDT
by
Hoodat
(Article 4, Section 4)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
D@mn right, one of the most awesome weapons of War ever created! enemies cringe in FEAR, just with the chance that an A-10 will be on the battlefield.
33
posted on
09/27/2014 2:36:48 PM PDT
by
2001convSVT
(Going Galt as fast as I can.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Exactly - fighting Mid-East dictators and terrorists with a super-expensive F-35 is like chopping fire-wood with a samurai sword.
34
posted on
09/27/2014 2:56:55 PM PDT
by
PGR88
To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
The Air Force wants to retire the A-10, an attack aircraft intended for close air support, to pay for its new and costly multipurpose F-35 stealth fighters... Designed to shoot Soviet tanks rolling across the open fields of Europe, the A-10 has been the primary aircraft for close air support of ground forces since the mid-1970s. Experts say that capability is well-suited to taking out ground targets in Iraq and Syria.
35
posted on
09/27/2014 3:19:54 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
"Retiring the decades-old fleet of about 300 A-10s would potentially save about $4.2 billion over five years, Air Force leaders have said". ... Even if you said you wanted to keep the A-10, where does the Air Force come up with the money to retain the A-10 and all that comes with it
and still get its full complement of F-35s?So we need $850 million per year to maintain the existing fleet of ships for five years. Obola has been running annual deficits of $1,000,000 PER YEAR for years and years. And they can't find that small amount of money to fulfill the most basic requirement of government -- national defense?
Obola and his democrat henchmen (and many Republicans in cahoots) make me sick. This is an almost trivial amount of money at the national level to maintain the most effective close support gunship ever built. It is perfectly designed for wiping out our muslim enemies in the ME.
To: ProtectOurFreedom
The AF hates the A10. They have been trying to get rid of it since before Gulf I. They don’t want anything that’s not MACH capable.
37
posted on
09/27/2014 3:27:16 PM PDT
by
antidisestablishment
(Half measures do not advance anything; they are only stakes in lost ground. Kill the RINOs.)
To: Goreknowshowtocheat
And it doesn't need a 6 mile turn radius at full power. It's more like a gigantic over-thrusted crop duster with a Gatling gun and missiles.
38
posted on
09/27/2014 3:33:14 PM PDT
by
blackdog
(There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)
To: JPG
To: ProtectOurFreedom
Whoops, left out a critical "Million"...
Obola has been running annual deficits of $1,000,000 MILLION PER YEAR for years and years.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson