Should there be a limit to the number of words a commie-lib “journalist” gets to utter or write under the 1st ammendment?
Is the religion of peaces propensity for violence finite?
Then neither should the ammunition store of an American be...
No.
It doesn't.
And the 1st Amendment doesn't give us the right to speak or publish freely, nor does it give us the right to choose and practice our religion freely.
There is a limit on how much ammo you can own. Your wallet.
5.56mm
Actually, this question begs a different question. Are laws banning the possession of fully automatic weapons (machine guns) constitutional?
Before I offer an answer, I would first establish that the right to defend my life and the life of others must first be justifiable. It must also, to the extent practical, not present a threat to others. Consequently, I can’t use a nuke to defend myself if that nuke will kill innocent people. On the other hand, I could use an anti-tank gun against an armored vehicle that is unjustifiable in attempting to take my life.
That leads to one more question and that is to what extent may I defend myself against the deprivation of my liberty? If the jack-boot thugs are coming in an armored car and they have a reputation for imprisoning and killing, can I can them first?
I have some opinions but just throwing the question out.
By the way, any law prohibiting ownership of automatic weapons is unconstitutional, no ifs, ands or buts about it.
Yogurt's legal but I'm a mean spirited little control freak and I WANT TO LIMIT how much yogurt a person can buy.
ONE container a week...
and I want a government organization to oversee yogurt sales. AND the IRS to fine people who buy more. Maybe even jail time for people who want to buy more...I want a limit on how much yogurt a person can buy.
Gads even thinking like a liberal for a minute makes me sick... they must be horrible people...
not really a good question because if your defending a position you don’t need to carry your ammo, you just need to keep it.
Even then there should never be a limit, became as technology changes much faster than law ever c/would the amount of ammo a man might require will also change. Simply put there is no point o setting a legal limit beyond that which you have or will lawfully buy.
Thus the real question is how much can you afford to trade for or make?
See my tagline.
Yes.
No less than 1,000 rounds for each weapon (exemptions for use thereof in earnest and pending resupply).
From http://www.volokh.com/posts/1190402417.shtml
(A good read on the various approaches the antis have tried.)
Arsenal licensing (courtesy our boy Chuck Schumer)
Any person who owns 20 or more firearms or more than 1,000 rounds of ammunition or primers (e.g. two “bricks” of rimfire ammo) would be required to get an “arsenal” license. To obtain a federal arsenal license, a person would need to be fingerprinted, obtain permission of local zoning authorities, and pay a $300 tax every three years. Her home would be subjected to unannounced, warrantless inspection by the government up to three times a year. “Arsenal” owners would also have to obtain a $100,000 dollar insurance policy.
“Brady II” redefines “firearm” to include magazines and “any part of the action” (such as pins, springs, or screws). Thus, if a person has two Colt pistols, three Remington rifles, and four magazines (of any size) for each gun, then he own an “arsenal.” Or if he owned two guns, six magazines, and a box of disassembled gun parts that contained five springs, five pins, and five screws, then he would own 23 “firearms” and would have to obtain an “arsenal” license.
No, of course not; it’s none of the government’s *&%#* business.
End of story.
We should be able to own TWICE as much ammunition as the government can own.
It should if hoarders are buying so much that I can't find what I need..........
Should there be a limit on the number of books you can own, newspapers you can subscribe to, speeches you can give, church services you can attend?
The .48% was the guy who couldn’t find 22lr at Wal-Mart.
Yes 0.48%
No 99.52%
From the article, “A man was stabbed by his wife, and she was charged.”
Were the knives seized from the residence as well? Nope. People are weird.
The question that was raised in the mind of the article writer was - How Much Ammunition is too much...when to me the question is - why did she stab her husband? In particular, since we all know guns have mind control devices embedded, why did she NOT shoot her husband, especially since it appears that she could have rendered him into a mass resembling freshly ground hamburger?
Perhaps she was pissed because she wasn’t getting enough range time?