To: Lexinom
As I recall the cancer he had was not usually fatal if treated promptly with conventional methods. He chose several new-agey methods for 6-8 months before seeking tradational treatment. By then it was too late.
76 posted on
09/24/2014 7:44:32 PM PDT by
matt04
To: matt04
As I recall the cancer he had was not usually fatal if treated promptly with conventional methods. He chose several new-agey methods for 6-8 months before seeking tradational treatment. By then it was too late.No, pancreatic cancer has a dismal survival rate...which may be why he looked to alternative treatments.
77 posted on
09/24/2014 7:53:57 PM PDT by
papertyger
(Those who don't fight evil hate those who do)
To: matt04; Lexinom
As I recall the cancer he had was not usually fatal if treated promptly with conventional methods. He chose several new-agey methods for 6-8 months before seeking tradational treatment. By then it was too late. No, Pancreatic Cancer has a 94% mortality rate at five years, and usually 100% at seven. . . and Steve was able to stave it of longer than normal, lasting almost 9 years from diagnosis. Some say he could have been more aggressive earlier. It was thought he had beat it, but not with his new-agey methods. He had a liver/pancreas transplant in Kentucky several years ago in 2009. . . but the rejection and anti-rejection drugs were killing him. Then the cancer came back and finished the job.
99 posted on
09/25/2014 9:52:23 PM PDT by
Swordmaker
(This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users continue...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson