Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Win or lose, the outcome of this election is on the GOP establishment
theweek.com ^ | 9/23/14 | W. James Antle III

Posted on 09/23/2014 5:16:12 AM PDT by cotton1706

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: cotton1706

The most interesting race is McConnell in Kentucky. An avowed enemy of conservatives and the Tea Party. If enough of them vote for conservatives in the election, but DO NOT vote for either McConnell or Grimes, McConnell could lose.

Not only would conservatives be rid of the most oppressive, divisive, conservative agenda blocking, Democrat coddling Republican leadership liberal, but it would shake the GOP-e to its roots.

It would be like the Eric Cantor loss times 10.

It might very well tip the balance in the next Republican National Convention for a conservative presidential candidate instead of the only candidates, Romney and Bush, the GOP-e will currently allow to get the nomination.

The McConnell race is *that* important.

Other fallout would be that John Boehner would not be reelected as Speaker of the House, so that worm would be gone as well. The House would be in full conservative revolt.

And the last two years of the Obama administration would be effectively neutered. Thank heavens.

A conservative House and a more conservative senate would kick the pluperfect snot out of him. Sure, he could veto, but vast numbers of his toadies would no longer get any funding.

Appropriations bills would be divided, so that the scoundrels were segregated out and their agencies and departments left to die.

And it all rides on McConnell losing this election, because conservatives and Tea Party people refused to vote for him.

Buh-bah, turtle man.


21 posted on 09/23/2014 7:51:13 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy ("Don't compare me to the almighty, compare me to the alternative." -Obama, 09-24-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MacMattico
Nobody can convince me Romney would have been the same or worse then Obama. I just don't believe it. And he wouldn't of surrounded himself with the likes of Valerie Jarrett and Eric Holder. I just don't believe it.

I hear you. That's why I voted for Romney in 2012.

But the past is the past, and I do not believe that the current GOPe, or any of the "moderate" candidates being touted for 2016, will take active steps to undo the Obama legacy.

They will move to "fix" Obamacare, but they will not work to repeal it. They will still work for amnesty, will not reduce government spending, will not slash taxes, will still continue the federalization of education (notice how "moderate" Mike Huckabee condemns conservatives for attacking Common Core), and will continue to back down or remain silent whenever some leftist politician accuses them of being racist, against the poor, or Islamophobic.

So I will not vote for any RINO candidates from this point on. For me it's either Ted Cruz, or someone very like him, or not vote at all.

The blame for a continuation of corrupt Democrat control of Congress and the White House belongs to the GOPs, not to conservatives like me.

22 posted on 09/23/2014 8:35:33 AM PDT by Maceman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Maceman

I agree with you that moderates will not take steps to roll things back. I would like to think they would hold the line where Democrats would push their agenda forward. The fact I feel I had to say “I would like to think” does truly bother me. But candidates are chosen and I feel I can only try to hold the line. That means no more Harry Reid to me. At least get a vote in the Senate on bills.


23 posted on 09/23/2014 9:24:57 AM PDT by MacMattico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Have you ever heard of a liberal taking responsibility for their actions? Just because they have an (R) in front of their names doesn’t change the fact the GOPE liberals will as you say blame us the conservatives or anything else under the sun, but it can NEVER EVER be their faults, that’s just not possible.


24 posted on 09/23/2014 10:38:19 AM PDT by sarge83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Losers, they don’t want to win.


25 posted on 09/23/2014 10:53:59 AM PDT by VRWC For Truth (Roberts has perverted the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706
Of course, they'll still blame us if they lose, for being against them, for primarying their canidates, for depleting their funds, and for not voting for the selected slate of candidates.

AND for us not giving money to the RNC like we have in years past.
26 posted on 09/23/2014 7:33:19 PM PDT by Din Maker (I've always been crazy, but, that's the only thing that's kept me from going insane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine
For what is the Tea Party to be blamed for?

For picking nominees who weren't quite ready for Prime Time; i.e. Sharron Angle, Christine O'Donnell, and those two idiots Todd Akin and Richard Mourdock. I don't care what anybody says; I still like Christine O'Donnell. The media worked tirelessly to paint her as a buffoon; just like they did Sarah Palin.
27 posted on 09/23/2014 7:37:52 PM PDT by Din Maker (I've always been crazy, but, that's the only thing that's kept me from going insane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MacMattico; All

Say what you will, but I would hope everyone would vote R this November.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Sorry, but if I lived in KY or MS I’d vote for a 3rd Party candidate or skip the Senate Race altogether before I’d vote for Mitch McConnell or Thad Cochran. I have to pray daily for forgiveness because I literally hate both of them more than I can put into words. I cannot even put into print on this world-wide web what I wish would happen to both of them. Now, in MS I could vote for the Democrat because he is a Conservative Democrat on Social Issues. He’s Pro-Life, Pro-Second Amendment and ANTI-Same/Sex Marriage.


28 posted on 09/23/2014 7:47:02 PM PDT by Din Maker (I've always been crazy, but, that's the only thing that's kept me from going insane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

How come Ted Cruz is not on your list to be primarying in ‘16?


29 posted on 09/23/2014 7:50:20 PM PDT by Din Maker (I've always been crazy, but, that's the only thing that's kept me from going insane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
McConnell in Kentucky. An avowed enemy of conservatives and the Tea Party. If enough of them vote for conservatives in the election, but DO NOT vote for either McConnell or Grimes, McConnell could lose.

And it all rides on McConnell losing this election, because conservatives and Tea Party people refused to vote for him.


Help me out here. Let's say on Election Eve, McConnell is ahead in the polls by 5 percent. Now, if 5 percent of the Conservatives/Tea Partiers do not vote for him, but don't vote for Grimes either, could that cause McConnell to lose?
I would love to know that 30 percent of Matt Bevin's supporters would NOT be voting for Mitch McConnell. I believe that is a deficit he could not overcome. What say ye?
30 posted on 09/23/2014 8:00:02 PM PDT by Din Maker (I've always been crazy, but, that's the only thing that's kept me from going insane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Din Maker

“How come Ted Cruz is not on your list to be primarying in ‘16?”

Because he was just elected in 2012. He’s not up again till 2018.


31 posted on 09/23/2014 8:07:03 PM PDT by cotton1706 (ThisRepublic.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

LOL..... I knew that; he’s my Senator. I was thinking Primarying for the Presidential Race. Sorry.


32 posted on 09/23/2014 8:32:54 PM PDT by Din Maker (I've always been crazy, but, that's the only thing that's kept me from going insane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706
And the next most vulnerable Republican incumbent? Mitch McConnell, Senate minority leader and Tea Party slayer.

Wouldn't it be just a hoot if Roberts squeaks out a win in KS, and the turtle loses in KY?

33 posted on 09/23/2014 8:39:59 PM PDT by meadsjn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MacMattico
Nobody can convince me Romney would have been the same or worse then Obama.

You can't blame conservatives for Romney's loss. He got more votes than McCain did in 2008.

Romney was defeated by voter fraud -- the same fraud machinery that the Republicans won't attack because they use the same machinery against conservatives in the primaries.

34 posted on 09/23/2014 8:45:10 PM PDT by meadsjn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson