Shows just how desperate they are. They’d be better off passing legislation banning people from listening to him. They’ll put up “Rush Free Zone” signs .....
What a joke.
DIMs/LIBs are mentally ill...and fascists.
It sounds as thought he Nazis and Commies are starting to feel the heat.
Again? This has to be the 9th or 10th such campaign.
Since he spends most of his show talking about the NFL or iPhone why do they care?
Forcing Rush off the air by illegal means is as much a civil war trigger as is a complete gun ban.
Again??? Is this a twice a year thing now?
Again?
(sigh)....there IS NO SUCH THING as a “Network Broadcast License”.
I don’t doubt Dems lie awake in bed all night thinking up new ways to SCROOOOO us. But whoever is writing these stories needs to get their facts straight.
Liberals/socialists/communists have to silence those they disagree with because they have no hope of defeating them with facts and cogent arguments.
It's a "SQUIRREL!" thing.
Anything to distract the Kulaks from the real problems.
The fact is radio in general and AM radio specifically is a dying medium. Many of the other big names have already fled the sinking ship. Rush would be in a much better position and reach a much larger (and younger) potential audience if he would give up the exclusivity deals with terrestrial radio and move to a multi-format setup (Like Stern, O & A and other big names). He could diversify into podcasting, maybe with an anchor show on Satellite radio, and perhaps still syndicate out to the remaining AM talk radio stations to reach those that can't get him on the other mediums.
Liberals: Always the first to demand censorship. They are nothing but book burning, speech censoring, fascists.
Yeah, a lib friend on FB had a post advocating taking Rush off the air. I was LMAO. What tools.
> During the Bush administration, national Democrat leaders threatened to kill the ABC network’s broadcast license if a miniseries unfavorable to the Clinton administration wasn’t censored to satisfy Democrats. ABC complied.
ABC aired the uncensored version and never showed it again. I had to work overtime while the uncensored version ran, so my wife taped it for me.
Heh, the fact that college dropout Limbaugh is smarter, richer, and far more self-successful than Bubba, the Hillabeast, and the dork twins (Obamadork and Holderdork) really frosts the liberals, not?
The truth is that Limbaugh was talking about a proposed policy at Ohio State that would require explicit permission between students before engaging in any kind of sexual activity. Here's what Limbaugh said in full. He starts by quoting the proposal:
"Consent must be freely given, can be withdrawn at any time, and the absence of 'no' does not mean 'yes.'" How many of you guys, in your own experience with women, have learned that "no" means "yes" if you know how to spot it? Let me tell you something. In this modern world, that is simply not tolerated. People aren't even gonna try to understand that one. I mean, it used to be said it was a cliche. It used to be part of the advice young boys were given. See, that's what we gotta change. We have got to reprogram the way we raise men. Why do you think permission every step of the way, clearly spelling out "why"... are all of these not lawsuits just waiting to happen if even one of these steps is not taken?