Posted on 09/22/2014 4:29:20 AM PDT by markomalley
“Chastity patrols”, created by an Iranian paramilitary group, are patrolling the streets of Iran to force women to go “well covered” in public.
At the beginning of summer, trendy Iranian women started wearing lighter clothes, more transparent veils to cover their hair and slightly shortened sleeves that still end below the elbow.
That tendency prompted the more conservative sectors to demand imposition of “good hijab” in accordance with a much stricter interpretation of the Islamic dress code.
But the Ansar-e-Hezbollah group has gone further and organised street patrols in Tehran “to control morality in women”, especially young women, who are more relaxed about complying with the hijab, which requires a woman to cover everything except her face, hands and feet.
The paramilitary group, which has the support of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, claims to have trained and launched “dozens of groups to enjoin good and forbid evil”.
The group’s 3,000 women and 1,000 men patrol the streets in civilian clothes to warn and intimidate those women who, in their view, violate the rules of decency required by the Islamic Republic.
The secretary general of Ansar-e Hezbollah, Abdul Hamid Mohtasham says it is necessary “to crush those who spread corruption”.
This development comes shortly after Rouhani, who won an election after promising greater social freedom, said in a speech that behaviour cannot be imposed on people.
“Is it possible to improve culture with vans, minibuses, police and soldiers?” he asked, in a clear reference to the morality police, who also prowl the streets.
“This is a religious dictatorship,” Saide, a 29-year-old resident of Tehran said.
She wears an ordinary veil similar to many young women, exposing much of her hair.
Her classmate Sharshani, 26, believes that “this act shows no respect for people”.
“Each person should be able to dress as he or she wants” is an idea that has been taking hold in a country with a predominantly young population.
Fatima, who works for a tourism company, points out that “in other [Muslim] countries, such as Turkey, there are women who are veiled and some who are not”.
“But those who are veiled do not look down at those who are not, they respect them, but here, they look at us with hatred, just because we wear makeup or nail polish,” she said.
“In theory, we cannot expose our hair in the street. But we all show it, but that means we could be stopped at any time. Always walking in fear.”
The presence on the streets of some 4,000 Islamic hardliners who do not respond to any official authority will only complicate the situation for those who have a more tolerant view of hijab.
Iranian Interior Minister Abdolreza Rahmani-Fazli said the patrols would need official authorisation to operate and made it clear that such permission would be forthcoming.
“The interior ministry is responsible for seeing to these issues and will have an appropriate response to the measures,” he said.
The breakup of islam into diferent sects occurred after Mohammed died. Who knows which sect he’d consider muslims?
As for the dominant clerical opinions.....I doubt you can say what they are.
“The presence on the streets of some 4,000 Islamic hardliners who do not respond to any official authority will only complicate the situation for those who have a more tolerant view of hijab.
Iranian Interior Minister Abdolreza Rahmani-Fazli said the patrols would need official authorisation to operate and made it clear that such permission would be forthcoming.” — these thugs, many of them are Palestinians or imported from a few arab countries, mercenary types too, along with arabized islamic iranian regime itself need to be uprooted. Reform most likely will not happen because the regime will lose control & power. And in reality, at present there isn’t any viable person or grp to topple the regime. Unlike what was done in Egypt with the army and someone like el-Sissi.
The Shah was at most a “cultural” Muslim.
One can only speculate what Mo would have or wouldn’t have done. But judging by Mo’s words & actions in addition to history of islam in iran alone, islam does not solely take an individual’s view of the religion or how an individual chooses to practice it Privately. It dictates an all encompassing social, political & economic system with very specific & stringent rules. That’s why the concept of “nationality”, for example, isn’t acceptable. That much has been very clear. Of course people can call themselves muslims or Personally choose what to practice or not.
Sounds like Taqiyya. You are dancing around the fact of what the plain text of the Quran and the hadiths say about Jihad.
By the way, care to talk about the logo on your home page?
I'm going to guess you are familiar with what Shiite clerics have to say about Jihad. Can you post any prominent cleric proclaiming that Muslims do not have any duty to support Jihad?
Those who lived in iran during the Shah’s era, and actually knew about zoroastrianism at least as a philosohpy, would also know that the Shah & his father not only tried to diminish islamic sharia practices, and modernize but also, socially & culturally, increadingly blend islamic concepts with traditional pre-islamic iranian culture & beliefs. Many clerics recognized that, didn’t like it, & attacked him for being “westernized”, among other things. OTOH, the blend led many average iranians to think that was real deal islam, so nothing wrong with islam. Perhaps had he or his dynasty lasted another few decades & on the same track their approach would’ve been more embedded. A big problem in iran has always been the clerics, most of them anyway.
lol
So there’s no misunderstanding, i’m laughing cuz i think you may be onto something there.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.