PosterboyIt is hard to comprehend for me because I can’t see reasoning behind alleged intervention. I can’t see objectives which aren’t attainable by diplomatic or economic means.
Posterboyquote-’’can’t see objectives which aren’t attainable by diplomatic or economic means.’’
By economic means you say further above, in a post,
that UKR would collapse on it own...
And by inference putler only have to pick up the pieces.
But we all know, wink, wink, including putler that
they won’t unless they lose the war..And it is war..
So when UKR made good gains in the summer, putler had
to invade to keep pressure on so they lose.
He has to help them lose the war so they collapse.
And I’ll take his word for it this once,as telegrphed by his invading actions, wink, wink...... that UKR....
is viable entity, if not losing war, if left alone.
Simple to figure out......