A girl has sex with a guy so she has his “dna material” inside of her. Perhaps the sex is a bit rough. She gives herself a few bruises after the fact.
There is no way to distinguish this “forensically” from a real rape and if the man is convicted and sent away no one knows the difference.
Wrong. In both instances there will be evidence on the cervix. In the rape situation, there will be evidence on the vagina’s entrance. If the female gets off on the roughness, there will be no significant evidence on the vagina’s entrance.
There are ways to distinguish,actually.For a long time I worked in the ER of a large hospital located in a major city.Like most such ERs we had a "rape crisis" team of nurses and physicians (mostly gynecologists) who were specially trained to identify signs of rape as well as treat and counsel victims of rape.These physicians and nurses would routinely testify as "expert witnesses" in rape trials.
And I can assure you that occasionally a woman would come in claiming rape and after having been examined the nurse and doctor who evaluated the woman would agree that she was lying.I heard such conversations more than a few times.