Wrong. In both instances there will be evidence on the cervix. In the rape situation, there will be evidence on the vagina’s entrance. If the female gets off on the roughness, there will be no significant evidence on the vagina’s entrance.
Really? Has this been or can this be demonstrated in an strictly scientific fashion? I doubt it.
Did the Kool-ade you drank taste good?
Case in point: this one.
So we are back to he said/ she said.
Or are you asserting that a lack of a rape kit means rape didn't happen?
Often with rape the victim is in shock and denial for some time. Some victims are chosen for their geographic or medical isolation. Children are particularly vulnerable.
On the false accusation end of the spectrum, it is a somewhat frequent happenstance that one parent in a divorce will inveigle their child to accuse the other parent or the other parent ‘ new SO. Victims of incest also sometimes falsely accuse someone outside the family in an attempt to keep their family intact and not be the bad one for destroying the family.
Things are not as cut and dried as you are attempting to make them seem.
You sound like a GOP Senate candidate with that explanation of how a woman’s body acts during rape vs rough sex. Please stop it.
Are you expecting those reading this to take you seriously?
Each of the three sentences are glaringly ridiculous.