Bundy can't very well claim that the federal government has no jurisdiction over the range land and then complain that they didn't put up a fence to keep his cow off the interstate now can he?
He may not be making that claim. I do not know if he is.
But if the Fed built a highway through his property, or on their own property, knowing that the land was used for grazing, are they not responsible for constructing a suitable fence to protect those using the highway?
My guess is this whole thing is more about retribution against Bundy then anything else.
Also; Since the Fed talks out of both sides of their mouth, why can't Bundy do the same?