Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Michael.SF.
If the Fed is leasing land for grazing purposes, should they not be responsible for maintaining the fence?

Bundy can't very well claim that the federal government has no jurisdiction over the range land and then complain that they didn't put up a fence to keep his cow off the interstate now can he?

31 posted on 09/19/2014 8:57:19 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: DoodleDawg
Bundy can't very well claim that the federal government has no jurisdiction over the range land

He may not be making that claim. I do not know if he is.

But if the Fed built a highway through his property, or on their own property, knowing that the land was used for grazing, are they not responsible for constructing a suitable fence to protect those using the highway?

My guess is this whole thing is more about retribution against Bundy then anything else.

Also; Since the Fed talks out of both sides of their mouth, why can't Bundy do the same?

35 posted on 09/19/2014 9:03:39 AM PDT by Michael.SF. (It takes a gun to feed a village,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson