Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoodleDawg
Bundy can't very well claim that the federal government has no jurisdiction over the range land

He may not be making that claim. I do not know if he is.

But if the Fed built a highway through his property, or on their own property, knowing that the land was used for grazing, are they not responsible for constructing a suitable fence to protect those using the highway?

My guess is this whole thing is more about retribution against Bundy then anything else.

Also; Since the Fed talks out of both sides of their mouth, why can't Bundy do the same?

35 posted on 09/19/2014 9:03:39 AM PDT by Michael.SF. (It takes a gun to feed a village,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: Michael.SF.
But if the Fed built a highway through his property, or on their own property, knowing that the land was used for grazing, are they not responsible for constructing a suitable fence to protect those using the highway?

No. They are responsible for constructing a fence to designate the right of way and to limit access. According to the story they did that. But they aren't responsible for keeping cows or deer or buffalo or whatever off the road. If a rancher allows his cattle to enter that right of way then he's responsible.

36 posted on 09/19/2014 9:11:40 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson