To: Yosemitest
If the RATS that crossed over to vote for Cochran in the runoff vote for Childers in the General, won’t that be proof positive that the law was broken? MS code that says you can’t vote for someone in the primary that you don’t intend to support in the general?
If I were True the Vote I would find each and every voter who went back and voted RAT (although technically Childers isn’t a rat) and publish the names. Set a precedent: you jack with elections, we jack with you right back.
22 posted on
09/20/2014 12:42:11 PM PDT by
txhurl
(2014: Stunned Voters do Stunning Things!)
To: txhurl
says you cant vote for someone in the primary that you dont intend to support in the general?
I mean wouldn’t the rat votes for Cochran have to be taken off his runoff counts if they voted for Childers in the general?
ESPECIALLY if those rats voted in the Dem primary and then crossed over for the R runoff?
23 posted on
09/20/2014 12:46:08 PM PDT by
txhurl
(2014: Stunned Voters do Stunning Things!)
To: txhurl
I agree.
But PROVING their intent AT THE TIME OF THEIR VOTE OF THE RUN-OFF,
versus them saying "I changed my mind due to information I found after I voted in the run-off ",
would be very difficult to do.
We all know the 'RATs that voted in that run-off, weren't intending on voting for "COCKROACH" in the General Election.
And the "ESTABLISHMENT REPUBLICANS" knew it too, BEFORE they even started this dirty-politics scheme.
But all they cared about was the POWER they were losing, and NOT about what their constituents wanted.
DAMN THEM TO HELL !
24 posted on
09/20/2014 12:54:46 PM PDT by
Yosemitest
(It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson