Replies

I agree.
But PROVING their intent AT THE TIME OF THEIR VOTE OF THE RUN-OFF,
versus them saying "I changed my mind due to information I found after I voted in the run-off ",
would be very difficult to do.

We all know the 'RATs that voted in that run-off, weren't intending on voting for "COCKROACH" in the General Election.
And the "ESTABLISHMENT REPUBLICANS" knew it too, BEFORE they even started this dirty-politics scheme.
But all they cared about was the POWER they were losing, and NOT about what their constituents wanted.

DAMN THEM TO HELL !

It would be very difficult for a RAT voter to explain why they voted for Childers in the RAT primary, then voted for Cochran in the primary runoff, then voted again for Childers in the general.

It would thusly be difficult for precinct chairmen to explain how their black precincts did that. There obviously will be no voting for Cochran in the black districts in the general. Yet there will remain history of 10-15K votes on their books for Cochran in the runoff.

True the vote (I need to send them money right now) could make MS the poster child for vote fraud and help states who don’t have it enact Voter ID.