Dunno if that would be a good idea.
Arresting Obama for his very real crimes is just a step away from arresting a departing politician for his policies. And just the other side of that is civil war.
Then the civil war will have been merely postponed another few years.
JFK stole the 1960 election. Nixon didn’t contest it because it would be divisive.
LBJ killed JFK, and got away with it, even though RFK and Jackie knew the truth. (Hoover had too much dirt on them.)
The Clintons have been criminals for thirty years. Skated every time. Even for rapes.
When G. W. Bush moved into the White House, the carpets and walls were covered with urine, feces, and graffiti. Bush covered it all up, because we needed a “new tone.”
The Saudis and the Democrat party put an illegal alien Muslim terrorist in the White House. Whose administration has abused the DoJ, the IRS, the EPA, etc., etc., etc., obstructed justice, destroyed evidence, committed perjury, treason, and murder.
But arresting “Obama” would be too “divisive.”
How bad does it have to get before traitors are tried for treason, perjurers are tried for perjury, murderers are tried for murder...
When the Muslim terrorists “Obama” has flown into the U.S. by the tens of thousands start cutting off heads, I think you will see “civil war.”