Posted on 09/14/2014 6:49:17 PM PDT by EveningStar
You left out the New Black Panthers.
Hope it is true... more house seats...(including ME-2 andCT-5), Senate and governor seats
Like the dog chasing the car, do McConnell and Boehner have any idea what to do with Congress once they have it?
Some Republicans, too.
Chickens...coming home...roost.
“Could be trying to motivate the idiots.”...
My first thought as well!
I’m think that as well. Carney’s trying to establish cred, would only really feel the need to lie in a way that benefits Dems (loyally saying the Dems were going to win). There’s no good reason for him to lie by saying the Dems will get crushed ... It benefits no one.
Also, his comments need to be viewed in relation to the other desperation measures we’re now seeing from Carney’s fellow Democrats. It’s not his comments alone, but the general pattern with them and others.
I did not say the Republicans are honest, worthy, should vote, win or that doing so would improve the society, I only proffered that this was shill sandbagging by a Rat to suppress the stupid party vote.
In 2012, GOPe supported mainly one candidate..Romney. All others were self appointed. 2016 will be a repeat. If conservatives cannot unite behind one candidate against the GOPe RINO, conservatives deserve the RINO nominee.
I do not buy that; one simple reason: his political policies/goals are generally the same as Obama's.
On socialized healthcare, Romneycare is far less intrusive than Obamacare. 78 pages versus 2500 pages plus.
Romney has actually created jobs by saving failing outfits. Obama has done no such thing. The GM bailout was unnecessary. GM going bankrupt only means a better run outfit buys their infrastructure. This happens all the time in real world.
Romney was for building Keystone pipe line on a priority basis. And he was for building a fence on the border. And he was against tax increases. All these are opposite of Obama agenda and would help the economy.
Romney and Obama are both social liberals, but I am talking about economy.
I don't think well be seeing it, at least from the GOP: they are happy with [and jealously guard] their elite status.
This is a straw man argument. Like I said, GOPe usually backs ONE candidate. He/she runs against half a dozen Conservatives who fight each other till the bitter end. In 2012 if either Newt or Santorum drops out, Romney was toast. There are not enough conservative voters in the country to anoint 2 or more conservatives over a single RINO candidate. Reality is a bitch, I know.
In 2016, I see many potential candidates I prefer such as Pence, Cruz, Walker, Jindal, Kasich, Rand, etc. If more than one of them stays in the race till the bitter end against one of Jeb/Mitt/Huckster/McCain etc, conservatives deserve to be flogged because of selfishness and ego's.
True.
I have no doubt.
Hmmm. There are no natural conservative candidates. Reluctance to run, is a great factor. Perhaps, letting the morons implode- will allow, sanity to return.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.