Islamic Rape Gangs: Rotherham is Just the Tip of the Iceberg

Breitbart ^ | James Dellingpole

[RoosterRedux]

I talk to George Igler of the Discourse Institute who has been following the Rotherham child rape gang story closely for the last three years. The full story is more shocking than you can possibly imagine, not just because of the ugliness of the abuse itself (redolent of that horrible scene from the movie Taken where smack-addled girls are serially abused in a filthy dive by countless grubby men) but also because of the extent of the cover-up by the left-liberal establishment of social workers, local government officers, child welfare charities, diversity co-ordinators, not to mention the regional police forces and even imams.

Truly this is one of the biggest scandals of our time. And it's going to get bigger.

Here are some of the disturbing revelations in the podcast.

• The rape gang phenomenon has existed in the UK for at least 25 years, the first recorded instance being of a trial in Birmingham in 1989. But - typical, this, of what was to come - the defendants were not Muslim rapists. They were the Sikh fathers of abused daughters who had tried to attack the perpetrators of the crime only to end up being arrested themselves while the police turned a blind eye to the sex crime.

• These practices have long been widely known to the police, to social workers, to child-care charities and local councils. All found an excuse to absolve the rape gangs of criminal behaviour by claiming that these sexual activities were consensual - ie that these girls, some as young as 11, were sluts who had it coming to them.

• Each child is worth about £200,000 (around $300,000) a year to the gangs - which makes them even more lucrative than the drugs trade.

[RoosterRedux]

Each child is worth about £200,000 (around $300,000) a year to the gangs - which makes them even more lucrative than the drugs trade.

Now we finally come to the reason behind this activity.

[ScottinVA]

If islam isn’t of Satan, I don’t know what is.

[Scrambler Bob]

Then just legalize it. Problem solved.

Then tax it. Problem solved.

(Sorry for that, I’ve got to go puke.)

[Gay State Conservative]

So many question! But the first “practical” question that springs to my mind is...how perverted must an adult male be to want to have sex with an 11 year old girl?

[RoosterRedux]

I believe that it is legal under sharia law.

[The_Media_never_lie]

Maybe Hollywood will make a movie about this in order to educate the world.

[RoosterRedux]

But, but...the Prophet did it with a 9 y/o girl.

[RoosterRedux]

They have. The movie is “Taken” with Liam Neeson.

[tacticalogic]

Then just legalize it. Problem solved.

The rape gangs, or the families of the girls retaliating against them?

[Tellurian]

... All found an excuse to absolve the rape gangs of criminal behaviour by claiming that these sexual activities were consensual ...

The Muslim community gives their consent?, is that what the rulemakers think?, so it's not the social workers place or law enforcement's place to intervene?

I'd say they've been steeped in "multiculturalism" a little too long, and the result is that, although they'll call it "tolerance", they're "racist": one set of rules for their "own" kind, and another set of rules for those they consider different from them ... with the further result that the Muslim community has no reason to depend on local law enforcement. No wonder the common Muslim has an open ear to the the radicals who want Sharia.

[yldstrk]

Seen the movie “A Time to Kill”? You can certainly understand the father’s desire to take matters into his own hands.

[caww]

....” one set of rules for their “own” kind, and another set of rules for those they consider different from them”....

Most minorities have similar mindset. Move them all to Michigan and let them go at it! Self-rule, and let’s see how they do.... There’s plenty enough of “their kind” already there to help them get started. Then declare it their state and close the borders around them.

Sounds like I’m fed up...yep I am.

[newfreep]

But, but...the Prophet Profit did it with a 9 y/o girl.

[varyouga]

Early teens were historically when girls would start having sex. Typically with an older man who would compensate the family for a virgin girl as soon as she resembled a woman. Otherwise she'd end up pregnant by some poor boy and become worthless.

Children in poor families would be seen as almost commodities- sons for work and girls for dowries.

Not saying it's right but humans lived not too differently from animals not too long ago. Even in Judeo-Christianity, teenage brides were completely acceptable.

It's not surprising these attitudes still exist and are much more common than we think

[Mr. Jeeves]

The Left needs those little brown men as footsoldiers in the War on Western Civilization, so they’d rather overlook their lifestyle choices - especially since they victims are mostly children of the Oppressor Race.

[onedoug]

The emulation of their foul prophet.

[Hulka]

“these attitudes still exist and are much more common than we think “

Only among uncivilized savages, especially muslime, and have no right to exist within a civilized society.

[Scrambler Bob]

The money part. Isn’t that like drugs?

Take out the incentive to make it stop?

[Sans-Culotte]

I would like to know more about how Rotherham began. Where did the girls come from? How did the Muslims get hold of the girls in the first place? Are they orphans?