Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DannyTN

In before the e-cig vendors, addicts, smokers, pot heads and libertarians show up to call me a nanny-stater for daring to post an article pointing out the health dangers.


2 posted on 09/04/2014 12:30:16 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DannyTN

I’m here!


4 posted on 09/04/2014 12:32:04 PM PDT by miss marmelstein (Richard III: Loyalty Binds Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: DannyTN

You’re only a nanny-stater if you want the government to outlaw them. Do you?


6 posted on 09/04/2014 12:33:44 PM PDT by Hugin ("Do yourself a favor--first thing, get a firearm!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: DannyTN

Next they’ll outlaw nicotine injections and then what will I do?


9 posted on 09/04/2014 12:36:49 PM PDT by BipolarBob (You can't fix stupid but you can vote them out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: DannyTN
In before the e-cig vendors, addicts, smokers, pot heads and libertarians show up to call me a nanny-stater for daring to post an article pointing out the health dangers.

For a relatively long article, it's remarkably fact-free.

19 posted on 09/04/2014 12:40:55 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: DannyTN

You posted the article, how were we supposed to beat you here :-)

BTW you would only be a nanny-stater if you want the government to do something about people choosing e-cigs. Regarding the article, there does seem to be some fear mongering on the part of the WHO but I would think it common sense that consuming high doses of nicotine is likely bad for you.


28 posted on 09/04/2014 12:45:28 PM PDT by RightOnTheBorder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: DannyTN

[ In before the e-cig vendors, addicts, smokers, pot heads and libertarians show up to call me a nanny-stater for daring to post an article pointing out the health dangers. ]

Oh E-cigs are definately dangerous, but so is getting in your car and driving or drinking a soda, etc etc....

The question is how much safer/more dangerous are they from conventional smoking...


35 posted on 09/04/2014 12:49:20 PM PDT by GraceG (No, My Initials are not A.B.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: DannyTN
In before the e-cig vendors, addicts, smokers, pot heads and libertarians show up to call me a nanny-stater for daring to post an article pointing out the health dangers.

"Daring"??? Oh, you brave little nanny-stater. How did you ever work up the courage? Have you no fear?
42 posted on 09/04/2014 12:53:41 PM PDT by jjsheridan5 (Remember Mississippi -- leave the GOP plantation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: DannyTN

What health dangers?


48 posted on 09/04/2014 12:55:44 PM PDT by Anitius Severinus Boethius (www.wilsonharpbooks.com - Sign up for my new release e-mail and get my first novel for free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: DannyTN

As long as you don’t demand e-cigs get banned, I don’t think anyone minds being informed.

And, no I am not an e-cig vendor, addict, smoker, pot head or any sort of purist libertarian (although I do agree with the smallest reasonable amount of government).


50 posted on 09/04/2014 12:58:02 PM PDT by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: DannyTN

I’m sorry...what is the health danger you are pointing out?


57 posted on 09/04/2014 1:09:00 PM PDT by Durus (You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: DannyTN
In before the e-cig vendors, addicts, smokers, pot heads and libertarians show up to call me a nanny-stater for daring to post an article pointing out the health dangers.

I have no complaint on you pointing out health dangers.I am all for people making informed decisions about their lives. Give them *facts* and let them do as they please.

Example, those who blame tobacco companies for current smokers are fools. There's no one under 60 smoking who didn't/doesn't know the health effects. So,they made a free choice. They choose not to believe the facts, that's their choice.

58 posted on 09/04/2014 1:10:09 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s ((If you can remember the 60s.....you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: DannyTN

Over 70+ posts and still waiting for you to point out those health dangers.


75 posted on 09/04/2014 1:24:49 PM PDT by TigersEye ("No man left behind" means something different to 0bama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: DannyTN
In before the e-cig vendors, addicts, smokers, pot heads and libertarians show up to call me a nanny-stater for daring to post an article pointing out the health dangers.

Dude. You posted this thread.

76 posted on 09/04/2014 1:25:22 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson