Skip to comments.
Why is the media committed to the lie that Bush went it ‘alone’ in Iraq?
Hotair ^
| 09/03/2014
| Noah Rothman
Posted on 09/03/2014 10:47:46 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
To: SeekAndFind
“The United Nations, too, declined to sanction the campaign to change the regime in Iraq.”
We were in Irag because of the UN.
To: SeekAndFind
The left eventually came up with a pejorative to describe the countries that joined the USA to oust Saddam:
THE COALITION OF THE W BILLING
3
posted on
09/03/2014 10:49:27 AM PDT
by
SeekAndFind
(If at first you don't succeed, put it out for beta test.)
To: TexasGator
The left eventually came up with a pejorative to describe the countries that joined the USA to oust Saddam:
THE COALITION OF THE W BILLING
4
posted on
09/03/2014 10:49:53 AM PDT
by
SeekAndFind
(If at first you don't succeed, put it out for beta test.)
To: SeekAndFind
Because he’s a Republican....................
5
posted on
09/03/2014 10:51:38 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(If you compromise with evil, you just get more evil..........................)
To: SeekAndFind
To protect and promote a false narrative that gives their political buddies power.
For the same reason they keep sticking to the lie that there were no WMDs in Iraq, that they later reported were found by ISIS...
6
posted on
09/03/2014 10:52:15 AM PDT
by
Darksheare
(Try my coffee! First one's free..... Even robots will kill for it!)
To: SeekAndFind
As Mark Steyn just pointed out on Rush’s show, Obama has no friends among our European allies. Bush was friends with Blair, Merkel, the French guy (my mind is slipping!), the Australian head and, infamously now, Putin. Who is Obama friendly with? No one. He’s incapable of international friendship because, again, as Steyn pointed out, he’s bored by them.
7
posted on
09/03/2014 10:53:06 AM PDT
by
miss marmelstein
(Richard III: Loyalty Binds Me)
To: SeekAndFind
Is he still referring to them as ISIL? I thought I heard him say “ISIS” today.
To: TexasGator
'We were in Irag because of the UN.'
Thus, part of the problem.
9
posted on
09/03/2014 10:54:58 AM PDT
by
Theoria
(I should never have surrendered. I should have fought until I was the last man alive)
To: SeekAndFind
As long as they lie long enough and hard enough, they can get the public to believe ANYTHING.
A sexual serial pervert now has a high popularity rating and is commanding hundreds of thousands a speech along with his wife and daughter.
Just about everyone has bought into the myth that climate change is the greatest evil of our time.
We have a anti American who made it his mission in life to destroy the military as Sec of State.
All accomplishments based on LIES.
To: woweeitsme
Is he still referring to them as ISIL? I thought I heard him say ISIS today. Give him a break. It's hard enough for him to not use the words "my friends" when referring to them.
To: SeekAndFind
‘We can continue to shrink ISILs sphere of influence,etc’
He is good at manipulation with his words. WHERE have we ‘shrunk’ anything having to do with ISIS??
12
posted on
09/03/2014 11:03:17 AM PDT
by
originalbuckeye
(Moderation in temper is always a virtue; moderation in principle is always a vice. Paine)
To: TexasGator
I remember a certain pedophile UN inspector that was most likely being blackmailed.
To: what's up
If you tell a lie enough times, it becomes fact in the minds of people eventually. For example, Judge Napolitano, someone who is considered more sympathetic to conservatives,on the radio today repeated the lie that Reagan armed Saddam Hussein with WMD. There is absolutely no truth to the statement, it would even be false if he said we armed Saddam Hussein with conventional weapons. Iraq at the time was armed by the Soviet Union, France, and South Africa, but the lie that it was the US is repeated so often that it becomes gospel to the uninformed. I guess since the vast majority of people do not read, it is easy to make a lie fact.
14
posted on
09/03/2014 11:04:42 AM PDT
by
gusty
To: SeekAndFind
The families of a lot of dead British servicemen would have something to say about that.
To: SeekAndFind
I assume that headline question is rhetorical
16
posted on
09/03/2014 11:06:37 AM PDT
by
ChildOfThe60s
((If you can remember the 60s.....you weren't really there)
To: SeekAndFind
Even now it is difficult to get accurate representations of either of the phases of the Gulf War in the media. There were, according to
THIS ARTICLE, 33 nations directly involved in the military activity in the first Gulf War, according to
THIS ARTICLE, six directly participating in the invasion in the second Gulf War and another 33 participating in activities thereafter, for a total of 39.
There are, of course, aspects to "support" other than direct military participation, including economic sanctions, medical relief, etc.
What indicates a severe dereliction of duty on the part of the 0bama administration is not that we don't have a military coalition lined up after six months of ISIS military activity, but that it appears only just now to have dawned on the administration, including 0bama and his Secretary of State, that any sort of collective response is anything more but a good idea to be explored later.
To: SeekAndFind
RE :”
Why is the media committed to the lie that Bush went it alone in Iraq?” Right on, Poland sent in 20 troops to fight with our 600 thousand.
That's a coalition.
18
posted on
09/03/2014 11:06:56 AM PDT
by
sickoflibs
(King Obama : 'The debate is over. The time for talk is over. Just follow my commands you serfs""')
To: miss marmelstein
RE: Who is Obama friendly with?
Hugo Chavez just died. Is Nicolas Maduro his friend?
19
posted on
09/03/2014 11:07:42 AM PDT
by
SeekAndFind
(If at first you don't succeed, put it out for beta test.)
To: SeekAndFind
More interesting is how Bush is the only thing winning the war on terror now.
many people miss that Bush’s multilateralism had such profound positive effects that it moved other national politics to the right.
Stephen Harper in Canada is one profound example of this and he is a staunch ally of Israel and opponent of terrorism. Several electorates moved to the right as Bush finished his second term.
Even the carrier George Bush [lsenior] is the principal launching point for strikes in Iraq now.
The vacuous logic of Obama and Hillary is being revealed. The RESET for Russia and the de-enemizing terrorists of Jarret/ Obama is seen for the naked incitement to aggression that it is.
Bush won and is still winning. The fact that he is still blamed proves that Bush is now serving a fourth term in the hearts and minds of patriots. All across the world, people can see plainly the bland anti-Americanism of our current leadership. They are committed to undermining American exceptionalism wherever possible.
20
posted on
09/03/2014 11:09:35 AM PDT
by
lonestar67
(I remember when unemployment was 4.7 percent / Cruz 2016)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson