Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vietnam Vet Loses Job After Speaking His Mind About Obama, Liberal Judges
Mad World ^ | August 31, 2014 | Sean Brown

Posted on 09/02/2014 7:32:23 AM PDT by lbryce

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: lbryce

It’s all part of the modern “Depravity Inquisition.” They’ll strive to destroy anybody who doesn’t embrace the depravity du jour. They may allow some to recant. The rest must be at least figuratively burned at the stake. Give them the power they crave and it’ll no longer be “figuratively.”


21 posted on 09/02/2014 8:37:04 AM PDT by afsnco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

I did a bit of math, here, figuring that when he left Vietnam, likely in 1975, he was a junior NCO about 25 years old and went into the Army Reserve, which is how he eventually became a Sergeant Major. About four years later he joined the St. Louis PD, after the police academy, assuming he was not an MP Green Beret. 35 years later he is 60 plus years old.


22 posted on 09/02/2014 8:38:46 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy ("Don't compare me to the almighty, compare me to the alternative." -Obama, 09-24-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Oh, but I thought we had Freedom of Speech!

< / s> There has been no Freedom of Speech in this country for years.


23 posted on 09/02/2014 9:25:04 AM PDT by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible. Complicit in the destruction of this country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

Not sure about the cops but in the military there is a specific UCMJ article that is used in this regard “detriment of the service” or some such (been a while).

Your not allowed to do any political activity supporting a certain candidate or position while in uniform or identify yourself as military unless you are acting in a role that requires interaction such as a PAO or CO and then it must be apolitical.

Technically retirees are also under the same rule as they are on the retiree rolls - but they typically let it pass.


24 posted on 09/02/2014 10:20:23 AM PDT by reed13k (For evil to triumph it is only necessary for good men to do nothings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

A contact at AFRICOM very adamantly stated that Page was never a CSM of, or with, AFRICOM. Sources are currently investigating just what role Page may have played in Djibouti. Trust me, when a bunch of Sergeant Majors get pissed off at someone making claims that aren’t true, you need to hide under a very large rock for a very long time. You should take that advice, Dan.

As more information comes in, I will present it to the public. Dan Page is a stolen valor dirtbag and should be publicly shamed for the rest of his life. That process will start here. You’re welcome.

Stay tuned for part two.

http://ross-elder.com/2014/08/26/upturning-the-page-the-deconstruction-of-dan-page/


25 posted on 09/02/2014 10:23:50 AM PDT by DJ Taylor (Once again our country is at war,and once again the Democrats have sided with our enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reed13k

Correct. We’d have to see his employment agreement/handbook and the union contract he was employed under for specifics but I’d guarantee tyat there are clauses about presenting the appearance of speaking on behalf of the Department and speaking in manner that reflects negatively upon the Department.


26 posted on 09/02/2014 10:27:08 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: reed13k
Your not allowed to do any political activity supporting a certain candidate or position while in uniform or identify yourself as military unless you are acting in a role that requires interaction such as a PAO or CO and then it must be apolitical.

There is a big difference between the military and police in this regard. There is a real need for the military to be apolitical and to not be seen as supporting one side over another. Police have never tried to be apolitical. Sheriff is an elected position, for heaven's sake! And police chiefs, police unions, etc., are always making political endorsements for candidates and ballot issues.

Unless the department can show that they have disciplined every officer making political statements of any kind, then they are guilty of viewpoint discrimination, which is a violation of the 1st Amendment rights of this officer.

27 posted on 09/02/2014 10:37:04 AM PDT by CA Conservative (Texan by birth, Californian by circumstance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf
Is it illegal to state your mind if you admit you work for the government? Can you accept a career that causes you to foreit your first amendment rights?

I know for the military, federal, and state employees, there are limits on what you can do with respect to speaking engagements, or other gatherings (can't wear uniform to political rallies, etc...). I'm certain there are limits at the county/city level, as well.

28 posted on 09/02/2014 4:42:47 PM PDT by IYAS9YAS (Has anyone seen my tagline? It was here yesterday. I seem to have misplaced it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hammer
Would that "good and vicious attorney and sue" be a partner @ Do-em, Screw-em, Righteously and Howe Law firm? /s

Just asking, some of the wondering minds may want to know.;-)

29 posted on 09/02/2014 6:15:42 PM PDT by Stanwood_Dave ("Testilying." Cop's don't lie, they just Testily{ing} as taught in their respected Police Academy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

Court cases...labor law and others....have set out that police and fire can be disciplined up to and a including termination for speech that the employer finds embarrassing to the organization even when that speech has been conducted off duty. This includes even when the employee does not wear their uniform or identify their employment status if it is easily found out by the public that they are employed as police and fire....aka google searches.


30 posted on 09/02/2014 8:50:00 PM PDT by TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig (This town needs an enema)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig

Court cases...labor law and others....have set out that police and fire can be disciplined up to and a including termination for speech that the employer finds embarrassing to the organization even when that speech has been conducted off duty.


Court cases have also set out that Obamacare is constitutional, and that eminent domain applies to cities confiscating property for private organizations.

I no longer respect the courts.


31 posted on 09/03/2014 6:11:20 AM PDT by cuban leaf (The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson