Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Correcto-mundo!

The problem has been that every president hits the reset: (Mars-Yes; Mars-No/Low Earth orbit-Yes; LEO-No/Mars Yes; Both-Yes).

Every time the reset gets pushed, the design working its way to prototype->manufacturing gets cancelled; new specs get issued; new proposals submitted, evaluated, approved; new design gets underway, and BOOM->reset.

So, long story short, no follow on machinery ever gets deployed. Saves money, but the existing equipment degrades through use. The end result - nothing, but talk and videos.


17 posted on 09/01/2014 2:18:51 PM PDT by Darteaus94025 (Can't have a Liberal without a Lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Darteaus94025

No, in fact, that is not correct. The successor to the STS was in development, but a bit underfunded, and a bit behind schedule, so the anti-American Party of the Single Party State led by Zero himself deep-sixed it.

http://www.spacelaunchreport.com/sls0.html


24 posted on 09/01/2014 2:45:39 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson