Gentlemen of the jury?
1 posted on
08/29/2014 6:07:14 PM PDT by
Loyalist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
To: Loyalist
I don't really think she's all that guilty ...
2 posted on
08/29/2014 6:09:58 PM PDT by
Ken522
To: Loyalist
When I was 15 that would have looked pretty good to me.Even now that I’m well past 15 it doesn’t look bad.
To: Loyalist
4 posted on
08/29/2014 6:12:16 PM PDT by
gaijin
To: Loyalist
5 posted on
08/29/2014 6:12:44 PM PDT by
gaijin
To: Loyalist
Your Honor, Not Guilty with an explanation.
6 posted on
08/29/2014 6:12:48 PM PDT by
Veggie Todd
(The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. TJ)
To: Loyalist
Was she messing with a boy or girl?
8 posted on
08/29/2014 6:13:51 PM PDT by
4yearlurker
(Some people say that experts agree!!)
To: Loyalist
Michael Myers playing the “It’s a man, baby” character.
9 posted on
08/29/2014 6:16:05 PM PDT by
Sirius Lee
(All that is required for evil to advance is for government to do "something")
To: Loyalist
10 posted on
08/29/2014 6:16:23 PM PDT by
T Wayne
(If you know how many guns you have, you don't have enough!!!)
To: Loyalist
not guilty .....and the kid is a jackass...
13 posted on
08/29/2014 6:18:21 PM PDT by
terycarl
To: Loyalist
She’s guilty as are all adults who have sex with minors. Appearance has nothing to do with it.
Many (most?) teachers are liberal. Most liberals are immoral. When a person is sexually immoral in their private life, that attitude may very well extend to their professional life given the opportunity.
Teachers are in an authority position over students. In my opinion, it doesn’t even matter if a student is legal age. People, like President Clinton, who use positions of authority to have sex with subordinates are at least very unprofessional.
Minors, by definition, are incapable of giving informed consent to sex with an adult—the perceived hotness of said adult being completely irrelevant.
14 posted on
08/29/2014 6:19:12 PM PDT by
CitizenUSA
(Proverbs 14:34 Righteousness exalts a nation, but sin is a disgrace to any people.)
To: Loyalist
No contest, with qualifications.
16 posted on
08/29/2014 6:22:10 PM PDT by
SgtHooper
(Anyone who remembers the 60's, wasn't there!)
To: Loyalist
Not Guilty. Her age now is 44. Obviously tall, slim, hard body, nice lady. Must have been “quality” at age 32.
(High school stud must have trip all over himself getting seduced.)
21 posted on
08/29/2014 6:49:57 PM PDT by
TaMoDee
(Go Pack Go! The Pack will be back in 2014!)
To: Loyalist
The guilty/innocent decision should take into account what she might have looked like to a 15 year old 12 years ago, when she was in her 20’s. The incident occurred in 2002.
To: Loyalist
Guilty on a lesser charge. Lack of good makeup.
23 posted on
08/29/2014 7:05:01 PM PDT by
jmacusa
(Liberalism defined: When mom and dad go away for the weekend and the kids are in charge.)
To: Loyalist
Well, she is/was a phys ed instructor. I’m sure she suitably instructed her students in the finer points of her discipline.
25 posted on
08/29/2014 7:15:59 PM PDT by
driftless2
(For long term happiness, learn how to play the accordion.)
To: Loyalist
To: Loyalist
29 posted on
08/29/2014 7:30:56 PM PDT by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
To: Loyalist
Are you asking if that is a gentleman of the jury? Could be.
30 posted on
08/29/2014 7:35:02 PM PDT by
Major Matt Mason
("Journalism is dead. All news is suspect." - Noamie)
To: Loyalist
Not Guilty, in my book, but, I’m 55. So, she looks good to me.
32 posted on
08/29/2014 8:14:13 PM PDT by
gigster
(Cogito, Ergo, Ronaldus Magnus Conservatus)
To: Loyalist
With beer goggles, not guilty.
33 posted on
08/29/2014 8:40:32 PM PDT by
tumblindice
(America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson