Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sherman Logan

Almost any group could satisfy that definition of “religion”, as long as “superhuman agency” could be the universe itself, fate, the laws of nature, etc.

Whether Islam is or isn’t a religion, it is also much more than a religion. It is also a cult (at all times) and an enemy of the US Constitution (by extremists or by all adherents when they become 10% of the population).

While our laws and Constitution allow freedom of religion, they do not allow the crimes used by cults and/or treason.

At http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3198476/posts?page=32#32 I suggested that Islam be considered a religion until its adherents approach 8% of the population, at which time it would be considered an enemy of the US Constitution because of its own requirements that its adherents become enemies of the US Constitution when they reach 10% of the population. Therefore, the policy should be that the nation will monitor the number of Muslims in the country to make sure that they never reach 8% or higher - thus allowing them to remain a religion not bound to commit treason against the US and our Constitution.


23 posted on 08/29/2014 10:37:47 AM PDT by butterdezillion (Note to self : put this between arrow keys: img src=""/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: butterdezillion
it is also much more than a religion.

I agree.

It is also a cult (at all times)

The most accurate definition of "a cult" being an unpopular religion.

The term actually had technical definitions till a few decades ago when it began to be used by "traditional religious leaders" to stigmatize new and "weird" religions.

By that definition, of course, the early Christians were "a cult." In Oz, till recently, Seventh Day Adventists were considered a cult, probably one that ritualistically killed children.

Of all the things I can think of as a bad idea, putting some government agency of deciding what religious beliefs are acceptable, and which are "a cult" or "not a religion" is very near the head of the list.

Look at it this way. There are a good many people who believe any disagreement with the gay agenda is "hate," and that any religion that teaches hate isn't "a real religion." Do you want a government agency to have the power to make that determination and use government authority to crush "hate religions?"

35 posted on 08/29/2014 11:01:46 AM PDT by Sherman Logan (Perception wins most of the battles. Reality wins ALL the wars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson